Yes, I was expecting your post before I could hit the post button. 😆 lol.You beat me to it in posting that![]()
Don't remember mine being snappy....guess I need to pull it out and take it to the range. Think I'll do that next trip.
I believe mine was made in Italy?...I'll take a look - when- I can dig it out.
Some of the Berettat 80 series are locked breech (Browning Hi-Power style with the tilting barrel) which reduce recoil. The two 80 series that I shot were both heavier pistols as well as locked breech.Don't remember mine being snappy....guess I need to pull it out and take it to the range. Think I'll do that next trip.
I believe mine was made in Italy?...I'll take a look - when- I can dig it out.
Which models, because I was not aware of that?Some of the Berettat 80 series are locked breech (Browning Hi-Power style with the tilting barrel) which reduce recoil. The two 80 series that I shot were both heavier pistols as well as locked breech.
Well, that is why I bought the 85 over the 84, years ago. I liked the thinner one too. But that thinner profile just killed that bottom thumb joint in the web of my hand. I had to stop after 50 rounds. The wider backstrap may have made a difference, maybe it wouldn't have. I have smaller hands that are pretty skinny. Someone with fatter hands probably would not have had an issue.I’m actually probably in the minority, but I find the single stack version to be a nicer fit and profile overall. When electing to go with .380 it is often for size. The thick frame on the double stack just seemed counterintuitive to me along with the feel in my hand. Maybe Beretta did it is because the single stack isn’t exactly ”slender” anyway, but…
Also not sure I want a rail on a .380 for the same reason. Trying to make a .380 into a “tactical” pistol seems off to me unless one lives in a place with government restrictions on civilian calibers.
I have an LCP. Yes, it isn't pleasant. But, to me, it was still better than the 85. As I stated above in post #14, it just didn't work for my thumb at all.After shooting a PPK clone and my LCP for years, I find even the Beretta 85 to be very comfortable to shoot.
I love Beretta's classic design also and the 85, in single or double stack, is a wonderful pistol.These little guns are pretty snappy, as they are blowback. I once had an 85, and it kicked more than a 9mm, IMHO. So, as awesome as these look, I'm not going down that road again.
Size -- the Cheetah is smaller than the 92 series.I have an LCP. Yes, it isn't pleasant. But, to me, it was still better than the 85. As I stated above in post #14, it just didn't work for my thumb at all.
I also find 9mms recoil less than the Cheetah. So, if one compares that alone - then what's the point? But, in that last video I posted, the DA trigger weight sounds great. IF it recoils less than the original, then I might be interested in it. I like the looks of that launch edition one.