Handgun Forum banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,880 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Chalk one up for the right to defend yourself and family. He should have shot the other bastard Too.
If the second crook was running or attempting to run away, shooting him (esp in the back) would be murder, and charges probably would have been applied. When he's running away or trying to, the threat has ended. Your adrenaline is still pumping and you want to avenge your family, *BUT* the threat has ended. YRMV. IMHO
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,629 Posts
According to the article, the homeowner was unarmed when wrestling with the guy on camera. Then he went in, armed himself with a gun from his safe, and shot the guy who was holding his family members at gunpoint.

GW
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top