Excellent post of a perspective I hadn't considered PX. Thanks.
Respectfully you are right, and you are wrong.
IF a person has been trained properly to keep his finger out of the triggerguard and off the trigger until he/she is ready to shoot something then you are right.
IF, however, a person has not been so trained then the difference between THAT person having a firearm with a Glocklike (or Glock) trigger vs the traditional DA/SA does have something to do with the safety of the firearm, in THAT person's hands.
For example, I'm an old (65) and I have owned firearms since I was twelve years old. Been carrying concealed, legally, since the summer of 1966. In the formative years of my firearms "training" (if indeed it can be called that) I was taught all of the standard safety rules of the time, but at the time (early 1950's) I respectfully suggest "keeping your finger off the trigger" was not one of them.
I WAS taught to never apply pressure to the trigger, but having your index finger lightly ON the trigger was simply the way it was done. The current "keep your booger picker off the trigger, and horizontally aligned along the side of the slide" (or thereabouts) is the relatively new, and excellent, way folks are trained, and with the advent of the everlite trigger pull, such as in the Glock and like types of firearms, it's prudent and wise, and if you watch every cop show on tv you can see it is standard NOW.
However, if you have the time, find yourself a retired senior citizen leo who was on the job in the 1950's and probably later too, and I'm willing to be that person will tell you just what I'm telling you.
When the issue weapon (and that carried by the majority of citizens who indeed carried during that time) was a traditional DA/SA revolver, generally a S&W or perhaps a Colt with a heavy DA trigger pull ,VERY FEW, a very, very few, persons MIGHT have be smart enough to keep their fingers off the trigger, but the fact is most of us were not that smart.
Watch an old movie or tv program of those times and you will find the folks with guns, police, good guys and bad guys, always had their trigger fingers right on the trigger when they expected trouble.
So, half a century into my personal life as a gun owner I find myself deliberately making a conscious effort to keep my trigger finger where it belongs, but even when I do fall back on my early (bad?) training I never apply pressure... Just something I don't do. Not saying I'm right, or smart, or the present training is not a great leap forward in safety while handling a loaded gun (yes, they are all loaded), but some folks are of the idea this has been common training for all times, and that's simply not true.
I'm willing to bet if you run into an old cop from "those days" and ask him/her (very few "hers" then too) he/she will tell you that if they were in a situation requiring the firearm to be drawn out of the holster then that same situation was dangerous enough, or offered the potential for being dangerous enough, to have the triggerfinger in the only place it would do them any good if firing their weapon was necessary, and that was ON the trigger.
Of course during that time,unless you were so stupid as to "cock" your weapon seeking the lighter SA trigger pull, a margin of safety was offered in the heavy DA trigger pull, which is not offered in pistols such as the Glock or PPS of today.
For me personally, I just consider my PPS as always "cocked" and my natural instinct is to treat it as such by keeping my finger out of the triggerguard like a good boy should anyway.
Betcha' most cops and such would have their fingers on the trigger, and the only allowance for safety might be the barrel of that firearm would be pointed up, or in a safe direction until the situation got critical, then the barrel would be pointed in the direction of the perceived threat, but perhaps pointed slightly down.
I think the new method of training as regards safety with a firearm as relating to the relationship between the trigger finger, and the trigger itself is great. I taught that method to my Son, and Granddaughter.
But no one ever taught me that when I was a kid, because that method was not the way it was done.
No offense intended, but even tho we are dying off at a pretty good rate now, there are still a bunch of folks who have done quite well, as regards safety, for many decades, by keeping pressure off the trigger until the right time, but keeping our fingers ON the trigger when we think might have to shoot something.
Just personal opinion, contrary opinions welcomed.
Excellent post of a perspective I hadn't considered PX. Thanks.
By your logic, people without training should only use double action only firearms.
Guns are as safe as their user. A “safer” gun does not fix an unsafe user. They are fixed by training. Training is applicable regardless of age.
If you can’t keep your finger off of the activator of a potentially deadly device, you should make the decision not to possess said device.
If you cant handle a gun safely, buy a knife. At least that way you only hurt yourself.
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." -Mark Twain
well speaking as a gunsmith and not a glockster as we are know as. glocks don't break as much as other pistols i maybe work on on 4 glocks a month and most of the time they are just putting on after market parts (mostly sights) the store that i work at really sells the glocks two to one (one being all other pistols in our shop). also think the "indestructible" rep that glocks get just adds more hype if one blows up. there have been alot of 1911 that blowup plus they been making them for almost 100 years now. had three come in the place i work where they where bought and yes i own a Springfield 1911 had a kimber but they pissed me off because of the severe lack of costumer service
opps don't know how to delete
If you want a safety on your Glock or PPS drop the mag and pull the trigger after checking the chamber is empty. Put the mag back in and you can't fire it till you rack the slide. You can keep your finger on the trigger as much as you want until you rack the slide.
Now if you plan on carrying it you will have the time penalty of having to rack the slide first before firing the round. IMO not a good idea.
I have the PPS in both 9mm and .40. Both great guns with no problems. Carry them all the time. Very good accuracy at self-defense range. Never have been sorry that I bought either one of them.
I like the Springfield XDM 3.8 in 9.. I had the original 4.5 one, but thought the grip made it a little large to carry conceled..
but now they make a "compact" version with smaller grip size for better conceled carry..
I had a PPS and thought it was also a great carry gun.. slim and lightweight. thought the grip was a little square and uncomfortable for shooting but it carried great..
Then I got caught up in the 9 vs 45 thing ("Cant carry anything other than a 45 they say")... and sold it and got a 3" Kimber 1911.. but still think about the PPS.. as i think it was a better carry gun.. and really a 9mm (or 40) should be enough if needed.
Oh yeah i just bought a 1972 Walther PP that i carry more now.. and its a 7.65 (.32)... and i thought a 9 and 380 was too small to carry.. scheech!!.. what am i thinking..
Hey if you cant make fun of yourself who can..
Bottom line is if you like the PPS then get it, its a great gun and i doubt you will have any issues with it..
I know its not an easy decision.. thats why we have more than one handgun... good luck