Experiences with Model 39 ?

    Results 1 to 14 of 14
    1. #1
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Posts
      76

      Experiences with Model 39 ?

      I'm considering a Model 39 to use as a carry gun.
      Any exprience with these pistols ? I have handeled several over the years, but never fired one.
      I really like the feel and the grip shape, and I think the old pistol might make a good carry piece.

      Any experience with them? Thanks.

      Mark

    2. #2
      Member Captain Crunch's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Flathead County, Montana
      Posts
      169
      No recent experience, but I carried a M39-2 as an off duty gun back in the 70s. Never had a problem with it, but all I ever fired thru it was factory FMJ or RNL handloads. JHP loads were almost non-existant back then. Depending on the age of your M39, it may or may not feed JHP loads reliably.

    3. #3
      Senior Member Mike Barham's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Arizona, baby!
      Posts
      5,081
      The old 39 feels good in the hand, but has so-so sights and usually a grungy trigger. The safety/decocking dingus works backwards. The worst "feature," however, is the lack of reliability with good JHPs, which are pretty much a necessity with 9mm.

      If you are dead-set on this design, look for a "Third Generation" variant of the old gun - try to find a 3904 or 3906. Better yet, if you want a single-stack 9mm crunchenticker, try something like a SIG P239.
      Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

      Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

      All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

    4. #4
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Posts
      76
      Yesterday saw 2 used 3913's...Might buy them both!
      Great size, and I prefer the DA over any SA pistol I have used for carry.

      Thanks.

      Mark

    5. #5
      Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      225
      3913 all the way. You might also look at a CS 9mm. I've had a 3913 and a 3913 tactical. They were great guns, and I ran jacketed hollowpoints through them without problem. As Mike said, definitely go for the 3rd generations, though.

      I'd agree they aren't the best triggers in the world, but the single-action pull isn't too horrible.

    6. #6
      Senior Member James NM's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      New Mexico
      Posts
      1,091
      The 3913's make a great carry gun. I used to have a 3913 LS , but I let a lady friend trade me out of it. I'm now a member of the plastic fantastic carry club, but the 3913 is a very fine weapon for carry.

    7. #7
      Member Old Padawan's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2007
      Location
      Phoenix AZ
      Posts
      818

      wierd

      I was just thinking of posting a want add for a 39. I need one for a gift (theres a backstorry).
      "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." -Mark Twain

    8. #8
      Member Revolver's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Posts
      897
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
      The old 39 feels good in the hand, but has so-so sights and usually a grungy trigger. The safety/decocking dingus works backwards. The worst "feature," however, is the lack of reliability with good JHPs, which are pretty much a necessity with 9mm.
      Not true of the 39-2. The previous 39(no dash) did not do well with HPs and is rarer and more expensive(collectible) than the latter 39-2.

      The 39-2 is a reliable and accurate pistol. I don't know what your standards are for a trigger but it beats a Beretta or Glock. The sights suck and aren't very rugged. That's about the only complain I had about the one I owned.

      If it's a -2 which I think it is it will serve you very well as a carry gun. This is from someone with real experience with this pistol.

    9. #9
      Member Magicmanmb's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      Myrtle Beach SC
      Posts
      105
      Fired and have both a 39 and a 639 for JHP 639 much more reliable feeding
      the 39 is more of a collector than a carry. But if you would like a 639 let me know what you got to trade I've been looking for a 659 long story there also.

    10. #10
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      4
      I have quite a bit of experience carrying a 39. My agency was the first to issue them and did for 32 yrs. I was issued a 39 and some of the later got 39-2. I kept my 39 and carried it for several years including a few while on SWAT.
      The problem the 39 had with feeding some ammo had was a hump in the feed ramp. Our smiths removed the hump in all the 39s to give them the same ramp as the 39-2. Problem solved. Those guys really knew their guns back then. In fact, it was due to our smiths and their recommendations that many of the changes were made to the 39-2, 439 and subsequent models including modifying the ramp and change in extractor.
      The 39 had the long extractor which was changed to short with the 39-2. Whether that's an improvement or not depends on who you talk to. Some of our smiths liked it, others never saw a need. Personally, I never had a problem with the long. I've run a lot of rds thru it of various makes including +P and +P+ and never had a problem with extraction.
      My 39 has a trigger that rivaled an old 52 but then it wasn't stock, out of the box trigger either as our smiths had touched it up some. Accuracy is almost on par with the 52 too.


    11. #11
      Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      225
      That's a great picture of a very nice piece.

    12. #12
      Senior Member Baldy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      Port St.John,FL.
      Posts
      6,740
      Great looking old gun with character marks on it. Good shooting Mr.Wadcutter.

    13. #13
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      4
      The condition of the grips kind of belies the finish of the gun. When I carried the 39 I had pachs on it. After I bought it from my dept I found a set of new woods for it. It's never been carried with those grips so the checkering is still sharp. The gun itself has a lot of holster wear as you can tell from the picture. The side of the slide isn't quite as worn as the picture would seem to show but the blueing is thin there. The flash kind of washed out along the side but there's still a lot of holster wear on the edges, along the dust cover, trigger guard, and rear of the frame. This is one I won't part with. Lots of sentimental value to me. I've since not run any more +P or +P+ ammo thru it and now just stick with pretty tame loads. I'd be just sick if it ever broke or cracked.

    14. #14
      Member
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Location
      New England
      Posts
      201

      Thumbs up Experience with model 39-2

      If you are going with the 39 Get atleast the 39-2. This gun has the many improvements recommended by the IL State Police. I carried the 39-2 as a police duty weapon in the late 1970s. It was 100% reliable with the remington HPs that I carried in it. I still think that the gun feels better in my hand than any other gun I have ever carried. You also should consider the next generation the 439. It is a little better on the safety stand point. It can be carried with the safety off which I do not recommend with the 39-2. A 39 or 39-2 will fire with the safety off if the gun is dropped on it's muzzle. I also am a big fan of my 3913 and you may want to look at that one also. Jim

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Search tags for this page

    s&w 39-2 review

    ,
    smith 39 2 reviews
    ,

    smith and wesson 39 review

    ,

    smith and wesson 39-2 review

    ,

    smith and wesson 439 review

    ,

    smith and wesson model 39

    ,

    smith and wesson model 39 review

    ,

    smith and wesson model 39-2 review

    ,

    smith model 39 review

    ,
    smith wesson 39-2 review
    ,
    smith wesson 3906 review
    ,

    smith wesson model 39

    Click on a term to search for related topics.