Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 642 or 442?

  1. 04-28-2012, 03:22 PM #1
    Hurryin' Hoosier's Avatar
    Hurryin' Hoosier
    Hurryin' Hoosier is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Columbus, Indiana
    Posts
    267

    642 or 442?

    As far as their respective finishes hold up, which would you prefer for pocket carry (in a pocket holster, of course) - a 642 or a 442?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Ads
  3. 04-29-2012, 12:36 AM #2
    1jimmy's Avatar
    1jimmy
    1jimmy is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    183
    first of all both are now available with or with out the internal lock, check smiths website for proper sku number. as far as the finish the 642 is the way to go especially if your going to use a holster. the 442 has a matte black finish which does not hold up well at all. i have a 351pd and a 327 nightguard with the matte black finish and it scratches or chips very easily.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Search tags for this page

442 or 642 finish
,

442 vs 642

,

442 vs 642 finish

,
642 holster
,

642 vs 442

,
642 vs 442 2012
,
642/442
,
cleaning the finish on a smith wesson 642
,
s&w 442 vs 642 finish 2012
,
smith 442 finish
,

smith 442 or 642

,
smith 442 vs 642
,
smith 442 vs 642 finish
,

smith 642 or 442

,
smith 642 vs 442
,
which is better a 642 or 442