Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    nuc
    nuc is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    10

    44 mag fps and energy difference 4" 5" 6"

    Looking for solo hiking revolver (protection against animals, bears, cougar etc.)
    What is real energy diff. between the 4", 5" and 6" in the model 629?
    The 4" would be more convenient with the 4"-but not if the power, shooting accuracy and controlability is diminished vs the 5" or 6".
    Another interesting question-thoughts on the light weight 329 scandium in the 44mag?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chino Valley, AZ
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by nuc View Post
    . . . What is real energy diff. between the 4", 5" and 6" in the model 629?
    Here you go, all you need to know about "inch difference" for .44 Mag or any other handgun caliber from the "Ballistics by the Inch" website.
    BBTI - 44 Mag

    Their nitty-gritty results for S&W 629 barrel length, velocity in feet/sec. for Federal 240 grain Hydra-Shok.
    1296 fps for 6.5" barrel 629.
    1227 fps for 4.875" 629.
    1094 fps for 4" 629 Mountain Packer.
    1120 fps for 3". 629 Mountain Packer with ported barrel.

    You asked about energy. Kinetic Energy = Mass x Velocity Squared (must use a conversion factor). "The result is left to the student".
    So, energy percentage differences will be greater due to the "squared" factor.

    A VERY good energy difference approximation can be done just by looking at the percentage difference in velocity squared if the bullet mass (weight) stays the same, like in this case.
    For the four cases shown above, I will call the 1296 fps for the 6.5" barrel "the baseline".

    0 % difference for the 6.5" baseline.
    -10 % diff. for 4.875".
    -29 % diff. for 4" 629 Mountain Packer.
    -25 % diff. for 3". 629 Mountain Packer ported.
    The result for the 3" ported seems "counter-intuitative" to physics. I have no idea why. But, actual tests.

    And, my opinion.
    Unless you are in Grizzly, Kodiak, or Polar country, I wouldn't worry about carrying a 3 or 4" barrel gun using a "premium" .44 Mag hunting load. YMMV.
    Also, other threads here discuss using a semi-auto 10mm hunting load (Glock 20) for extra rounds. Also a good choice IMHO.

    Quote Originally Posted by nuc View Post
    Another interesting question-thoughts on the light weight 329 scandium in the 44mag?
    OK, just my thoughts about 44 oz. for 629 5" barrel versus 25 oz. for 329PD 4" barrel scandium and titanium in .44 Mag.

    No problem with the lighter gun. But, at purchase you must present a notarized letter from your mental health professional.
    "xxxxx is certified by me to be suffering from a severe case of a masochistic personality disorder".

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chino Valley, AZ
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by DanP_from_AZ View Post
    . . . OK, just my thoughts about 44 oz. for 629 5" barrel versus 25 oz. for 329PD 4" barrel scandium and titanium in .44 Mag.

    No problem with the lighter gun. But, at purchase you must present a notarized letter from your mental health professional.
    "xxxxx is certified by me to be suffering from a severe case of a masochistic personality disorder".
    I posted this response, and "when I come back", here is Billy's take on the 329 Bodyguard. This pretty much says it all for a 25 oz. .44 Mag, with real results.
    Model 329 Night Guard 44 Magnum "Muzzle Flash" Pics And Video

    The recoil doesn't seem any more than my 44 oz. Ruger Alaskan 2.5" super-snubby in .454 Casull full-loads (260 grain, 1800 fps, 1871 ft-lb).
    But the muzzle flash is a LOT more, I think. I've only shot mine in broad daylight. I'll have to try my Alaskan in low light conditions sometime.

  4. #4
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,255
    Hey, nuc, have you ever actually fired a .44 Magnum (in any barrel length)?

    It's not a beginner's gun, no matter where you're going to hike and what critters you'll face.

  5. #5
    nuc
    nuc is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    10
    yes, and the 357 and 10mm semi. Some difference but with practice and training-all will be manageable.

  6. #6
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,255
    Just checking.
    I'm glad that you know what you're getting into.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chino Valley, AZ
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
    Just checking.
    I'm glad that you know what you're getting into.
    Thanks Steve, a big "PLUS ONE" for covering my "you know what".
    After all my long verbose replies, I forgot to ask Nuc the most obvious question.

    Not the first time, and won't be the last time I forget to see the forest while slogging through the trees.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

4 barrel 44magnum velocity
,

44 mag 4 versus 6 barrel velocity

,
44 mag barrel length vs accuracy
,
44 mag enrgy
,

44 mag velocity from 4-inch barrel

,
44 magnum 6 inch vs 4 inch
,

44 magnum ballistics barrel length

,

44mag energy

,

ruger alaskan 44 mag ballistics

,
smith and wesson 44 magnum 4 inch or 5
,
sw 629 barrel length
,
whats the difference in vel and energy when going from a 6in barrelto a 4in barrel in a 44mag in barrel
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1