I found a rental 226 in 40 s&w, I shot 200 rounds and got a feel for it, and liked it. With 9 mm ammo so hard to find, I think I'm going to get the 40.
I've been out of shooting for about 30 years and I'm just getting back into it.
The Sig's seem to fit me well and I like the feel and quality. I like the P226 tacops, but I can only find one locally in 40s&w. I've rented a couple of guns at the range 1 was a 40 and 1 was a9mm. Found the 9mm more comfortable and the 40 had a snap in the recoil. I can't find anywhere around that has a sig for rent so I'm comparing apples and oranges.
My question is, with the weight and bulk of the sig tacops, would the 40 s&w still be a big difference from the 9? Or should I just wait for a 9mm to become available? This would be a gun for the range.
Thanks for any insight.
I found a rental 226 in 40 s&w, I shot 200 rounds and got a feel for it, and liked it. With 9 mm ammo so hard to find, I think I'm going to get the 40.
I picked up the P226 tacops in 40 on Friday...700 rounds and flawless.
I changed out most of my firearms to .40 cal. last year...just like shooting .40 the best.