Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 28 of 28
  1. #26
    Mike Barham's Avatar
    Mike Barham is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Arizona, baby!
    Posts
    5,081
    Quote Originally Posted by Blkhawk73 View Post
    Oh no wait, that's already been done by dozens of companies but little ole me forgot nobody whines about that.
    Not whining, just wondering why people are excited about a straight-up copy of an existing design.

    But then again, I didn't get excited in 1985 when Springfield brought in their first Imbel 1911A1s to compete with the Colt Government Model. And look what happened there!
    Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

    Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

    All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

  2. Ads
  3. #27
    45ACP-Reedie is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    3
    Alright, I have a question for everyone: I've heard people say that the LCP platform could obviously never handle the 9mm round. I disagree, but I'm not sure I fully understand the issue. Here's what I've learned:

    The difference in length between 9mm and .380 is 1.8mm. In the overall length of the 2.75" barrel, I think this is negligible (same goes for the extra grip length that would be needed for 9x19 rounds instead of 9x17 rounds).

    The difference in width at the base of the brass (because 9mm is tapered) is 0.43mm. In the overall width of the gun (0.82" = 20.82mm), this seems to be negligible.

    The maximum chamber pressure rated by SAAMI for .380 is 21,500psi, whereas 9mm is rated at about 35,000psi. This is a significant difference, and results in a bullet with about 40% more kinetic energy out of the 9mm. Let's explore this, too:

    It seems to me that dealing with more kinetic energy being imparted to the slide is just a matter of having stiffer springs, and a shooter who's willing to take the punishment of that energy on the tiny LCP grip. Fine - seems doable.

    I also figured that maybe the chamber would need to be thicker to hold the pressure. However, the 9mm Kel Tec PF9 is only 0.88" wide - only 0.03" wider on each side of the chamber (if the extra width is in the chamber) than the LCP. This suggests that a 9mm can be made just as slim as the LCP.

    So, can anyone tell me why the LCP couldn't be made in 9mm? It's not very obvious to me.

  4. #28
    dondavis3's Avatar
    dondavis3 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Dallas / Fort Worth Texas Area
    Posts
    1,843
    +1 Blkhawk73

    I got the feeling - just bashing for bashings sake.

    Not real helpful or constructive either.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

compare ruger sr 9mm lc 9mm
,
lcp 9
,
lcp 9mm
,
lcp9
,
lcp9 reviews
,
lcp9mm
,
ruger lc9mm
,

ruger lcp 9mm

,
ruger lcp 9mm reviews
,

ruger lcp9

,

ruger lcp9mm

,
taurus lcp 9mm
Click on a term to search for related topics.