Introducing The Ruger Ccw .380

    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 29
    1. #1
      Junior Member bluehandgun's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Posts
      73

      Introducing The Ruger Ccw .380


    2. #2
      Member nukehayes's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Stationed in San Diego, home is Newark, OH
      Posts
      488
      Well, it looks like they took a KT P3AT and stamped their logo on it. A little bigger too, not really impressed, probably costs more than the KT.

    3. #3
      Junior Member bluehandgun's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Posts
      73
      for ruger it is a big step. this will most likely mean smaller versions of the sr series, etc.

      ruger is finally entering the ccw market.

      rugers are well made, affordable guns. i would buy a ruger with no hesitation... a keltec? how's never?

      way to go ruger.

    4. #4
      Senior Member hideit's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      west chester ohio
      Posts
      1,499
      wonder if Ruger really will make it so reliable that kel tec will loose a lot of sales

      i heard they make close to 900 3AT's a week with lifetime guarantee so...
      has Ruger really done it?

    5. #5
      Senior Member Baldy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      Port St.John,FL.
      Posts
      6,740
      I have the KT-3AT and in my area they are about $100 bucks cheaper than the LCP. Since the frist 50rds in my KT it has been totally A-OK.

    6. #6
      Member Snowman's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      North Carolina
      Posts
      369
      I think it looks awesome.

    7. #7
      Member Black Metal's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Utah
      Posts
      272
      Another poly striker fire compact whoopitydo

    8. #8
      GM HGF Gold Member
      Wandering Man's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Coastal Bend, TX
      Posts
      2,121
      No instruction manual, so no way to tell how to break it down.

      But looking at the exploded view, it looks suspiciously like my Keltec.

      I'd like to get my hands on one and compare it with my Keltec.

      WM
      Never argue with drunks or crazy people.

    9. #9
      Senior Member Mike Barham's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Arizona, baby!
      Posts
      5,081
      Well, Ruger is never innovative. They basically take proven designs and make rugged and reliable versions of same. Witness the Mini-14, a shrunken Garand. Their DA revolvers aren't startlingly original, except they can be field-stripped. Their SA revolvers are basically modernized Peacemakers. The P85 was about twenty years late, as was the SR9. Now they are basically copying an innovative KelTec model.

      If it's reliable, it should be a good gun. I don't know why I'd prefer it to my KelTecs, which are both totally reliable and inexpensive. If Ruger had made this in a more serious caliber - 9mm or .40 - they might have something. As it stands now, I don't see what it does that a P3AT can't do.

      I will continue to pursue my mild interest in the KelTec PF9 instead of Ruger's late entry in the .380 sweepstakes.
      Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

      Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

      All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

    10. #10
      Senior Member Baldy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      Port St.John,FL.
      Posts
      6,740
      From the looks of them I would say they break down the same as a KT.

    11. #11
      Member Snowman's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      North Carolina
      Posts
      369
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
      Well, Ruger is never innovative. They basically take proven designs and make rugged and reliable versions of same. Witness the Mini-14, a shrunken Garand. Their DA revolvers aren't startlingly original, except they can be field-stripped. Their SA revolvers are basically modernized Peacemakers. The P85 was about twenty years late, as was the SR9. Now they are basically copying an innovative KelTec model.

      If it's reliable, it should be a good gun. I don't know why I'd prefer it to my KelTecs, which are both totally reliable and inexpensive. If Ruger had made this in a more serious caliber - 9mm or .40 - they might have something. As it stands now, I don't see what it does that a P3AT can't do.

      I will continue to pursue my mild interest in the KelTec PF9 instead of Ruger's late entry in the .380 sweepstakes.
      True, true. Ruger is well behind the curve. Still, improving on proven designs is the best way to design anything. See also Ford F150 -> Toyota Tundra. I'd like to see Ruger come out with a genuine sub-compact in 9mm as well.

    12. #12
      Senior Member Mike Barham's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Arizona, baby!
      Posts
      5,081
      Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
      True, true. Ruger is well behind the curve. Still, improving on proven designs is the best way to design anything. See also Ford F150 -> Toyota Tundra. I'd like to see Ruger come out with a genuine sub-compact in 9mm as well.
      Agreed, and I'm not criticizing Ruger for using proven designs as a basis for their guns. I just don't see what this one will do that my P3AT can't do for less money - but maybe it will have a better trigger or last longer than a KelTec.

      I remember when Ruger introduced the SP101 as a concealed carry gun. It was in a market that already had good snubbies like the J-Smith and the D-Colt, but the SP101 carved a nice niche for itself. Maybe this gun will do the same.

      But I want a reliable 9mm pocket gun that costs less than an AR15.
      Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

      Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

      All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

    13. #13
      Senior Member hideit's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      west chester ohio
      Posts
      1,499
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
      Agreed, and I'm not criticizing Ruger for using proven designs as a basis for their guns. I just don't see what this one will do that my P3AT can't do for less money - but maybe it will have a better trigger or last longer than a KelTec.

      I remember when Ruger introduced the SP101 as a concealed carry gun. It was in a market that already had good snubbies like the J-Smith and the D-Colt, but the SP101 carved a nice niche for itself. Maybe this gun will do the same.

      But I want a reliable 9mm pocket gun that costs less than an AR15.
      all good points
      if it doesn't have a better trigger etc etc then why would someone buy it for more $$ than the 3AT

      mike- then you are implying that there is not a pocket 9mm that costs less than an ar15?

    14. #14
      Senior Member Mike Barham's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Arizona, baby!
      Posts
      5,081
      Quote Originally Posted by hideit View Post
      mike- then you are implying that there is not a pocket 9mm that costs less than an ar15?
      The true pocket 9mms I'm aware of are the Rohrbaugh R9 ($1100), the Kahr PM9 ($600ish), and the KelTec PF9 ($300ish). While I am confident the first two are reliable, they are pretty pricey. I am concerned about the reliability of the PF9, but I will probably buy one to try out when I get back home. It's only $300, after all, which isn't much for a gun. If it doesn't work, I'll likely just stick with my P3AT.

      I was mainly joking about the AR price comparison, though the KelTec is the only one not in that general price range. I don't even have any ARs anymore. I sold all mine and have no interest in getting any more.
      Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

      Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

      All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

    15. #15
      Member Snowman's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      North Carolina
      Posts
      369
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
      But I want a reliable 9mm pocket gun that costs less than an AR15.
      Me and you both. When one finally comes out they'll sell like hot cakes.

      If only the new Walther was ~ $450...

    16. #16
      TerryP
      Guest
      I remember many years ago Ruger came out with the transfer bar safety system and they also re-energized the single action revolver market and as they matured as a company the innovation stopped. Their focus seemed to change to we can make it stronger and reliable. They now seem to realize how far back they have fallen in the marketplace as their marketing group dropped the ball.

      Back to the topic I'm not big on mouse gun calibers but would consider a similar sized 9 MM.

    17. #17
      Member forestranger's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      NC
      Posts
      244
      Have owned 8 Rugers in my life. Have 4 now. Had some problems with one but after two trips to factory, Ruger fixed it. Have 4 Kel Tecs including P3AT. None have had to go home for repairs and they get shot and carried regularly. None of my Rugers are well suited for cc. Whether the new Ruger is a Kel Tec ripoff, better, worse, etc., I'm kinda glad to see them jump into small affordable ccw arena. I'd like to see them try a small 9mm too.

    18. #18
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      37
      When you compare the internal parts to the p3at there are only 2 new parts added. One for the manual ejector (it doesn't lock back on the last shot) and one other...

      check out the KTOG site. its amazing. I would be amazed if this gun isn't taken off the market after a good and deserved suing from Kel Tec.

    19. #19
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      37
      lots of pf9 talk.

      My first gun and it has been nothing but fantastic.

      I believe either I have a fluke or you are just hearing a few loud people on the build quality. aren't they at like 20,000 of them already?

      There is no need improvements on the newest models, and they are the only ones in most stores currently.

    20. #20
      Senior Member spacedoggy's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Location
      Planet Zeon just outside of Tyler Texas
      Posts
      1,225
      Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
      Well, Ruger is never innovative. They basically take proven designs and make rugged and reliable versions of same. Witness the Mini-14, a shrunken Garand. Their DA revolvers aren't startlingly original, except they can be field-stripped. Their SA revolvers are basically modernized Peacemakers. The P85 was about twenty years late, as was the SR9. Now they are basically copying an innovative KelTec model.
      Right on the money. I wonder if their plan is to try to improve on proven models. Take Joe Blow, he went to a gun show and wanted a pocket 9mm. One of the vender's had both the Ruger LCP and the Kel-Tec P3AT. If priced the same chances are he would go for the Ruger because the finish looks a lot nicer and the Ruger name. Now Spacedoggy is looking at the new Ruger and wants to see if he should sell his Kel-Tec for the new Ruger. He sees that the new Ruger's finish is 100 times better than the Kel-Tec but he knows that's not important because he is not going to hang it on the wall. The only way he will give up his Kel-Tec is if the Ruger has a great new action where it's really smooth and improves his shooting skills with the little pocket pistol.

      The action is the only thing that would make me even look at this new piece and just plain curiosity.

      I really would like to see Ruger come out with some thing new and exciting in the auto pistol market. They need to work themselves out of the box.

    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Search tags for this page

    introduce 380

    ,

    on the ruger sr9 what does sr stand for

    ,

    ruger lcp aftermarket sights

    ,

    when will ruger introduce lc380s

    ,

    will ruger make a lc380s

    Click on a term to search for related topics.