Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Surculus Solitudo's Avatar
    Surculus Solitudo is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fort Mohave, AZ
    Posts
    45

    How Do You Measure a Group?

    I recently shot some groups at the range with my handguns and rifle. I have always measured my groups from center to center on the largest spread between two. I am sure that I do it this way because that is the way my Dad did it. It got me to thinking though. Should I measure from outer edge to outer edge. Or from inner edge to inner edge.

    Which method do you think is correct? Thanks!

  2. #2
    DevilsJohnson is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,373
    As long as you're consistent I don't guess it matters too much. Most the people I know try a center to center measure. I usually do outside to outside. But that's just when I'm shooting alone. I figure the outside of the hole is the hest out so if you're keeping that inside where you want it it's all good

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Bessemer City NC
    Posts
    155
    Largest dimension outside to outside converted to hundredths, minus the bullet diameter is the way it will be done if you ever compete in rifle disciplines, not sure about pistol as I have never competed with one. I have had many groups in the .3's and a few in the .2's over the years with rifle. The last comp I went to was won with a .187" group! There have been a couple of zero groups scored, but not many.


    EX- 5 shots measures 3/4" outside to outside 3/4" = .750

    .750 ( group size in hundredths ) minus .308 ( bullet diameter ) = .442 group size


    As you can see 3/4" groups will get you nothing in a rifle comp. I generally have to get into the low 3's to get in the money, and the 1's or 2's to win.

  4. #4
    TOF's Avatar
    TOF
    TOF is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Arizona
    Posts
    3,015
    The only way you can compare accuracy of different calibers is by using center to center measurements.

    Using outside when comparing a .22 group that measured .35 outside to a .45 group measuring .45 would yield a misleading conclusion.

    My method therefore is use of C/C values.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Bessemer City NC
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by TOF View Post
    The only way you can compare accuracy of different calibers is by using center to center measurements.

    Using outside when comparing a .22 group that measured .35 outside to a .45 group measuring .45 would yield a misleading conclusion.

    My method therefore is use of C/C values.

    That is why the big bores are so dominant in rifle competition, and the reason I switched to a .338 edge for competition. The 6 and 6.5 mm have far better ballistics, but you are giving up almost a full hundredth of an inch by using them. Now when it comes to the limited class I always shoot my 6.5x.284, or my 7mm RUM. If I could ever figure out a way to get a .458 win out to a thousand yards thats what I would use in the unlimited class, and I would win every event based on the 2 hundredths advantage I would have before I sent the first round downrange.

    The problem with center to center is that most groups in competition are one ragged hole, pretty hard to find 1 center, much less 2!
    Last edited by tropicmaster; 02-17-2010 at 09:31 PM. Reason: clarity

  6. #6
    terryger is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by tropicmaster View Post
    That is why the big bores are so dominant in rifle competition, and the reason I switched to a .338 edge for competition. The 6 and 6.5 mm have far better ballistics, but you are giving up almost a full hundredth of an inch by using them. Now when it comes to the limited class I always shoot my 6.5x.284, or my 7mm RUM. If I could ever figure out a way to get a .458 win out to a thousand yards thats what I would use in the unlimited class, and I would win every event based on the 2 hundredths advantage I would have before I sent the first round downrange.

    The problem with center to center is that most groups in competition are one ragged hole, pretty hard to find 1 center, much less 2!
    unless you can cover all your shots with a 50 cent piece and give somebody 35 cents in change you still need practice

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

.22 grouping with auto hand gun

,
correct way to measure pistol groups
,

how to measure firearm group size

,
how to measure group size for a pistol
,
how to measure groups .22lr in competition
,
how to measure groups handgun
,

how to measure pistol grouping

,
measure pistol bullet groups
,
measuring handgun groups
,

pistol measuring groups

,
quick method measure group size
,
the correct way to measure handgun group
Click on a term to search for related topics.