Post a thread about it with a pic.
Nice piece. :smt023
S & W is nice but overpriced. Taurus is nice and priced right. Both have had their issues but both are good guns. I prefer the Large frame Taurus to the mid size Trackers.
Those who buy a taurus buy it because it is cheaper or at least that is why I bought one. I soon sold it. It didn't have that solid feel to it. Now, I wait until I have the money for a S&W or Ruger when it comes to revolvers.
If money was not an issue I would go with a S&W.
If you are just looking for something to use a few times a year I would go with a Taurus. I own the Taurus's, two are revolvers. So far no problems.
Get the smith, take care of it, and leave it to your grandkids. Enough said...
I have a Taurus 617CH in polished SS. I've never had any trouble with it.
I would get the Taurus.
I have both and carry them equally.
there definitely both nice but if i had the extra money i would go with the s&w but seeing as how i dont have the extra cash i would choose the taurus
although i vote ruger
I'm in the process of falling in love with the Smith 686 + I just got. I've never owned a Taurus, but I hear nightmare stories about customer service. I'd get the Smith or the Ruger.