Printable View
I do have personal experence with Hi-Point. I had one and tried it for a few years. I even spent a wad of money trying to fix it. I told by gun smiths that it was junk and not worth spending the money to fix it. My Hi-Point did nothing but FTF. Worst of all it had a tendancy to eject the magazine after firing a round or two.Quote:
Originally Posted by drgriffi1
I am sure there are alot of good stories out there about Hi-Point but that is my story and why I vote NO on Hi-Points.
The Glock comments crack me up,,if I based all my judements on things I've read I'd be a hermit
Apparently it's that time again for the friendly reminder of ....Quote:
Originally Posted by drgriffi1
WE DO NOT DISCUSS, ALLUDE TO, INSINUATE IN ANY WAY TO, ANY ILLEGAL ACTIVITY ON THE FORUM! If there is any confusion on this issue, read this thread http://www.handgunforum.net/forum-announcements/11796-threads-about-illegal-activity.html
I swear to God, the next person that even mentions doing something illegal, joking or not, is gone!
I've owned or shot extensively the following brands/guns: Beretta 96, Bersa 380, KelTec 380, S&W Sigma 40, Kimber CDP, Kimber TLE, Glock 19, Taurus 24/7, Browning Buckmark, SA XD9SC and various wheel guns. I never ran into a lemon that I wouldn't trust to save my life in this group of guns.
:anim_lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by bdp2000
:smt022my glock 19 is a fine gun and i do trust my life with it i had a charles daley 45 auto and it sucked and the taurus revolvers i had would jam because the cylinder timing was off taurus said and these gun were new out of the box and they were junk!
EDIT: Oops...didn't read the second page and assumed it ended after the first. Apparenty the situation has been handled already, making my comment irrelevant.