Is there a difference in recoil?

    Results 1 to 6 of 6
    1. #1
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Posts
      28

      Is there a difference in recoil?

      How much of a difference is there in the recoil of a .40 and .45 caliber? How much depends upon the load?

    2. #2
      Member literaltrance's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Location
      Kirkwood MO
      Posts
      408
      Quote Originally Posted by wickedrider View Post
      How much of a difference is there in the recoil of a .40 and .45 caliber? How much depends upon the load?
      This is going to depend largely on who is answering, but personally, yes I think there is a significant difference.

      Typically, the 45ACP recoil will move the handgun more than a 40S&W, but the velocity at which the recoil distance is traveled is slower than the 40S&W. This is probably due to the much lower PSI rating of the 45ACP, even in +p loads. So while followup shots on the 45ACP take longer, repeated recoil is, in my opinion, much more forgiving to the hands.

      I've got no problem firing 40S&W in small doses, but if I exceed 200 rounds a session, I do begin to notice fatigue and sometimes physical wear (blisters). I've never gotten tired of shooting 45ACP, or 9mm for that matter

      Think of the 40S&W as a midrange musical instrument (trumpet) and the 45ACP as a lower band, bass musical instrument (saxophone or maybe even tuba).

      [Edit]: I've seen plenty of people who claim they notice little-to-no difference between 40S&W and 45ACP recoils. To be honest, I envy these guys.

    3. #3
      Senior Member
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Kentucky
      Posts
      3,373
      A .40's recoil is snappier than a 45. Shooting a 45 the recoil feels more like a push where the 40 moving much faster from the dead stop will will make it feel much the same as to how the weapon rises but it does it faster.

      All that will depend on the bullet weight and what weapon is firing it.

    4. #4
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Pearl, MS
      Posts
      55
      I'm one of those people who haven't noticed very much difference, with a catch. With my Beretta, the difference isn't that bad. Then again, it is a bigger, heavier, gun. On my Taurus Millenium Pro PT140, the difference is really noticeable. To be honest, though, the difference hasn't been enough to make me want to switch away from the .40.

    5. #5
      Member TheReaper's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Alabama
      Posts
      380
      I have .40 and .45 M&P fs and it seems like the .40 has a little more kick than the .45.

    6. #6
      Senior Member
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Kentucky
      Posts
      3,373
      Most the people that don't like the .40 are people used to a 9mm or new shooters that don't know what to expect. The recoil is snappier than a 9mm but it's not like it's so much a difference that it's going to hurt you...

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •