Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    branch is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    22

    Thumbs up velocity of a 9mm in a revolver

    I'm planning on buying a ruger speed six in 9mm from a coworker. I'm curious if there is any difference in fps versus a 9mm pistol. Would the recoil be similar to a .38?

    thanks

  2. #2
    DJ Niner's Avatar
    DJ Niner is online now HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    North-Central USA
    Posts
    4,462
    I have a DBI book titled "The Gun Digest Book Of 9mm Handguns" (1986), and in it, they test fire 50 different 9mm handgun models/variations with the same 6 loads (three factory loads, and three handloads). You didn't mention what the barrel length was on the Ruger Speed Six in question, but luckily, they tested both the 2.75" and 4" barreled guns. Here is the data for the three factory loads, for the Rugers and a few common 9mm autoloaders:

    Winchester Silvertip 115 grain JHP

    Ruger Speed Six, 2.75" bbl -- 1201 FPS
    Ruger Speed Six, 4" bbl -- 1254 FPS
    SIG 226, 4.4" barrel -- 1177 FPS
    Glock 17, 4.49" bbl -- 1215 FPS
    Browning HP, 4.625" bbl -- 1261 FPS
    Beretta 92F, 4.9" bbl -- 1169 FPS

    -------------------------------------------------
    Federal 9BP load, 115 grain JHP

    Ruger Speed Six, 2.75" bbl -- 1180 FPS
    Ruger Speed Six, 4" bbl -- 1228 FPS
    SIG 226, 4.4" barrel -- 1140 FPS
    Glock 17, 4.49" bbl -- 1245 FPS
    Browning HP, 4.625" bbl -- 1259 FPS
    Beretta 92F, 4.9" bbl -- 1182 FPS

    -------------------------------------------------
    Federal 9AP load, 123 grain FMJ

    Ruger Speed Six, 2.75" bbl -- 1070 FPS
    Ruger Speed Six, 4" bbl -- 1092 FPS
    SIG 226, 4.4" barrel -- 1058 FPS
    Glock 17, 4.49" bbl -- 1071 FPS
    Browning HP, 4.625" bbl -- 1113 FPS
    Beretta 92F, 4.9" bbl -- 1112 FPS

    -------------------------------------------------

    The accuracy of the Rugers was better than some of the autos, worse than others; right in the same ballpark, I'd say. The shooter will make or break accuracy testing, in any case.

    Recoil will probably be just a bit snappier than all but the strongest .38 loads fired in the same size/weight gun; 9mm velocities are higher, but bullet weights are lower. Overall energies are higher with the 9mm loads, and that energy output is felt on both ends of the gun.

    Hope this was helpful.

    .

  3. #3
    branch is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    22
    Thanks for the nice chart Dj niner. I'm surprised the ruger stacks up with the pistols, I thought there might be a little compression loss. The 226 lags for some reason.

  4. #4
    DJ Niner's Avatar
    DJ Niner is online now HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    North-Central USA
    Posts
    4,462
    The barrel/cylinder gap probably does account for some loss of pressure and velocity, but it is at least partially offset by the way barrel lengths are measured in pistols vs. revolvers.

    Pistol barrel lengths include the chamber in the overall measurement; revolvers do not (barrel is measured from the forcing cone at the rear of the barrel, to the muzzle at the front). When you add the length of the cylinder to the revolver barrel measurement, you get closer to an apples-to-apples comparison of "true" barrel dimensions.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

9mm fps pistol
,
9mm handgun fps
,
9mm pistol velocity
,

9mm revolver ballistics

,
9mm revolver fps
,
9mm revolver velocities
,

9mm revolver velocity

,
9mm velocity in revolver
,
beretta 9mm autoloader
,
pistol vs revolver velocity
,
ruger speed six 9mm
,
speed test of 9mm pistols
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1