Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Masteryoung's Avatar
    Masteryoung is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    26
    I like my P3AT so far,..

  2. #22
    Shipwreck's Avatar
    Shipwreck is offline HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Beretta City, Texas
    Posts
    10,902
    Quote Originally Posted by dosborn View Post
    I would step up to the 9mm. Have you looked at Kahr (PM9 I think)? A little (okay, a lot) more money but the size is great.
    This thread is actually about a year old.

    I have since sold the Keltec 32 and bought the PM9 - several months ago actually.

  3. #23
    ToyCloser is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Gainesville, Fl.
    Posts
    23
    I love shooting my .380

  4. #24
    agoetz2005's Avatar
    agoetz2005 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Posts
    52
    I already had a WWII .32, so when my buddy got his .380, I shot them side by side.The Kel-tec being lighter had mor bark, but as far as size and manageability goes it was easy to handle.


    We shoot shotgun clays at 50 yards with that little .380 all day

  5. #25
    cluznar is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    38
    I plan on getting a Kel-Tec P-32 for a pocket gun. Loaded with FMJ Ball ammo it will do the job up close.

    Bersa Thunder .32
    Bersa Thunder .380
    Ruger SR9c 9mm

    All for carry IWB


  6. #26
    sgms is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    can be found in Arizona or Ohio most of the time
    Posts
    370
    Have one of the Kel Tecs in .32 and wanted to up caliber also, decided on the 9 m/m P-11 Kel Tec. It is larger but not enough so that it causes my any problems with pocket carry. Only real problem is the recoil and pinching. Put finger extender on mags. and trigger shoe on to bring it down from uncomfortable to shoot to just not much fun to shoot.

  7. #27
    berettatoter's Avatar
    berettatoter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,333
    Quote Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
    I have owned a 32 ACP version of the Keltec for about 1.5 years now.

    I've toyed with the idea of getting a 380 one eventually.

    But, do the ballistics of the 380 round justify the cost? Is there really much difference between the 2 rounds (ballistically)? I know the 380 is better - but is it really worth buying another gun?
    The .380 will carry a little more muzzle energy, but for what you will use the gun for, I would just carry the .32 ACP and be good to go. JMHO.

  8. #28
    Shipwreck's Avatar
    Shipwreck is offline HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Beretta City, Texas
    Posts
    10,902
    Well, the thread is like four years old now. This isn't even. Possibility, now. Have long since got rid of the 32. Evenntually got. Kahr pm9. Got rid of that earlier this year one week after buying my first shield.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

.32 acp vs .380

,
.32 acp vs .380 acp
,

32 acp vs 380

,

32 acp vs 380 acp

,
380 vs 32acp
,
kel tec 32 acp review
,

kel tec 32 vs 380

,
kel tec 380 vs 32
,
kel tec 380 vs kel tec 32
,
keltec 320
,
keltec 380 vs 32
,
keltec32
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1