32 ACP Keltec vs 380 Keltec - Page 2

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    Results 21 to 28 of 28
    1. #21
      Junior Member Masteryoung's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2009
      Location
      Missouri
      Posts
      26
      I like my P3AT so far,..

    2. #22
      HGF Forum Moderator
      Shipwreck's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Beretta City, Texas
      Posts
      11,452
      Quote Originally Posted by dosborn View Post
      I would step up to the 9mm. Have you looked at Kahr (PM9 I think)? A little (okay, a lot) more money but the size is great.
      This thread is actually about a year old.

      I have since sold the Keltec 32 and bought the PM9 - several months ago actually.

    3. #23
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Location
      Gainesville, Fl.
      Posts
      23
      I love shooting my .380

    4. #24
      Banned agoetz2005's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2009
      Location
      Murfreesboro, TN
      Posts
      52
      I already had a WWII .32, so when my buddy got his .380, I shot them side by side.The Kel-tec being lighter had mor bark, but as far as size and manageability goes it was easy to handle.


      We shoot shotgun clays at 50 yards with that little .380 all day

    5. #25
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Mar 2012
      Posts
      40
      I plan on getting a Kel-Tec P-32 for a pocket gun. Loaded with FMJ Ball ammo it will do the job up close.

      Bersa Thunder .32
      Bersa Thunder .380
      Ruger SR9c 9mm

      All for carry IWB


    6. #26
      Member
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      can be found in Arizona or Ohio most of the time
      Posts
      370
      Have one of the Kel Tecs in .32 and wanted to up caliber also, decided on the 9 m/m P-11 Kel Tec. It is larger but not enough so that it causes my any problems with pocket carry. Only real problem is the recoil and pinching. Put finger extender on mags. and trigger shoe on to bring it down from uncomfortable to shoot to just not much fun to shoot.

    7. #27
      Senior Member berettatoter's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2011
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      1,913
      Quote Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
      I have owned a 32 ACP version of the Keltec for about 1.5 years now.

      I've toyed with the idea of getting a 380 one eventually.

      But, do the ballistics of the 380 round justify the cost? Is there really much difference between the 2 rounds (ballistically)? I know the 380 is better - but is it really worth buying another gun?
      The .380 will carry a little more muzzle energy, but for what you will use the gun for, I would just carry the .32 ACP and be good to go. JMHO.

    8. #28
      HGF Forum Moderator
      Shipwreck's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Beretta City, Texas
      Posts
      11,452
      Well, the thread is like four years old now. This isn't even. Possibility, now. Have long since got rid of the 32. Evenntually got. Kahr pm9. Got rid of that earlier this year one week after buying my first shield.

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Search tags for this page

    .32 acp vs .380

    ,
    .32 acp vs .380 acp ballistics
    ,

    32 acp vs 380

    ,

    32 acp vs 380 acp

    ,
    32 auto vs 380
    ,
    32 vs 380 ballistics
    ,
    32acp vs 380
    ,

    kel tec 32 vs 380

    ,
    kel tec 32 vs kel tec 380
    ,
    kel tec 380 vs 32
    ,
    kel-tec 32 vs 380
    ,
    keltec 32 vs .380
    Click on a term to search for related topics.