jasonsic: Sir; I know exactly what you mean. SW638 goes with me; ugly; no shape; just fits the pocket. All BUSINESS. You on the other hand have a good looker plus a "flat pocket'. My shooting partner has one and it'll take you a little while to get comfortable; it'll hit.
As far as Holsters we have a 'leather smith' locally that will soon be making his Khar model.
Follow up with your experiences.

Congrats on your new guns. You guys are cold heck I get excited if I am buying a bee-bee gun. Good luck with them both.

Baldy: Sir; bless your heart Mine has been riding my pockets for several years. Did just recently get some leather for it.
Never wanted any 'leather' until I met "Murph" He showed me how his were made, and now I have 2 "Murph's" 1 for 638 1 for G17-G22 I have another that fit for either the G's. that "Murph" didn't make. He'll be making me and my shooting buddies 'Leather'
Murph made a sling for my buddys 1895c and it was nice.

Tell me a little about the accuracy of the CW9.

I'm an owner of several Kahr pistols, but they are all polygonal rifling throughout their barrle.

I'm on the fence about the P9 or the CW9 based on the lower price, however I want decent accuracy. So if the CW9 is close in accuracy as the other Kahr models, I'm sold. However, if accuracy is hindered up to 20 yards (don't care about her since it's a ccw piece), I'd like to know so I can make my purchase accordingly.
Thanks

Myk9noseknows: Sir; as I have stated here and in other threads.
I do not own a Khar. My shooting partner has one that I 'blast' away with.
My shooters include Glock, Ruger, SW at different levels. [Background only]
My experiences out to about 50yds it's ok. A handful [not proper descriptive]
but adequate. 5-10yds plum dang accurate. Pocket ability without peer.
My shooting partner doesn't have my ego, not quite as accurate for him at 50yds. [two different perspectives]
In my NSHO it'll serve the general public well. Handles well; but the conceal thing is best.
Would I have one? NO. I carry SW638; not because there is anything wrong with the Khar. My preference.

Originally Posted by Myk9noseknows

Tell me a little about the accuracy of the CW9.

I'm an owner of several Kahr pistols, but they are all polygonal rifling throughout their barrle.

I'm on the fence about the P9 or the CW9 based on the lower price, however I want decent accuracy. So if the CW9 is close in accuracy as the other Kahr models, I'm sold. However, if accuracy is hindered up to 20 yards (don't care about her since it's a ccw piece), I'd like to know so I can make my purchase accordingly.
Thanks

I can't compare the CW9 to other Kahrs since the CW9 is the only Kahr I own. Accuracy for me has been very very good. I have been amazed that I can punch holes in the X ring consistantly from 10 - 15 yards with such a light, small pistol. I am accustomed to shooting 1911's and never thought this little Kahr would be so accurate. Gold Dot 124 gr. SB is my carry load.

Originally Posted by Myk9noseknows

Tell me a little about the accuracy of the CW9.

The CW9 isn't going to be as accurate, but in my experience is plenty accurate for self defense. I had the CW9 originally and was so impressed I upgraded last week to the PM9. CW9 would easily shoot less than 2 inches at 25 feet. My PM9 will shoot 5 shots that you can cover with a quarter at the same distance.

If I were choosing between the P9 and CW9 and didn't want night sights or the black finish (CW series has front sight pinned in place), I'd save some money and get the CW. If Kahr offered a CW package in the PM series I would have chosen it without hesitation, but I opted for the PM because of the slightly smaller size. No regrets either way.

I use a Fobus C-21b Elite Concealment holster that works perfectly. It is a paddle holster that is very comfortable, very light and holds the gun securely. At under $25 it can't be beat.