Fair enough, you've made up your mind and I respect that. Before you read the following, please understand that if I had any weapons with feeding issues I would also use FMJ for protection; I have no problem with it.
Now, you did not say anything about hollowpoints reducing the chances of overpenetration and ricochets. I thought I would mention this because this is the primary reason why I use hollowpoints; delivered muzzle energy is a distant second. If this is not a concern for you I understand entirely. Just treat this as an FYI. It is not my intent to incite debate where it's not wanted.
If you're going to go with ball ammo, I would stick with the tried and true 230g. I think a lot of that manstopper characteristic comes from a slow-moving and heavy bullet which was more likely to deliver maximum muzzle energy to its target at close range. It would seem to me that lighter bullets increases the chance of overpenetration as does any ball with a +p load.
As far as brands go, I think it's more of a question of what NOT to shoot rather than pinpoint a brand quality manufacture.
-Wolf (occasional bunk primer and steel casing's generally not good for firearm)
-Federal "Classic" (I had a VERY bad batch of 2k, your mileage may vary)
-unknown reloads (for obvious reasons)
The nice thing about going with 45ACP FMJ is that you've essentially opened up your options to a large host of target loads. I've been very satisfied with the following:
-WWB (of course)
-Magtech
-Sellier and Bellot
-Fiocchi
-Speer Lawman Target
I have no doubts this list can be expanded by fellow forum members.
[Edit]: Although I have seen them, I have yet to personally encounter a FMJ flatnose for 45 ACP. I'm not sure what the reason is behind this shape of bullet for 45ACP (or at all for that matter), but I would think this slightly increases FTFs.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

