LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
For a range/competition gun, it's fine.
It should be avoided on a defense gun, since you may have to fire with the pistol tucked in the "retention position." Shooting like this with a compensated pistol may direct jets of hot gas into your eyes. Fighting blind is not a good thing.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Compensated or not?
-
12-23-2007, 09:08 PM #1
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Pittsboro, NC
- Posts
- 281
Compensated or not?
It seems like the cost difference between compensated and non-compensated models is very minimal. Compensated benefits seem worth having. Any thoughts?
-
-
12-23-2007, 09:25 PM #2
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Arizona, baby!
- Posts
- 5,081
Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII
Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.
All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.
-
12-23-2007, 09:31 PM #3
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Pittsboro, NC
- Posts
- 281
Damn good point! Lucid thinking prevails!!
-
12-23-2007, 09:55 PM #4
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Port St.John,FL.
- Posts
- 6,741
Mike said it all right there. If I was shooting in a league that allowed it them I would have one. Never for defense though.
Posting Permissions
Search tags for this page
compensated glock benefits
,difference between compensated and non guns
,difference between compensated pist and non compensated
Loading links...
