Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Dynamik1's Avatar
    Dynamik1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pittsboro, NC
    Posts
    281

    Thumbs down Compensated or not?

    It seems like the cost difference between compensated and non-compensated models is very minimal. Compensated benefits seem worth having. Any thoughts?

  2. #2
    Mike Barham's Avatar
    Mike Barham is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Arizona, baby!
    Posts
    5,081
    For a range/competition gun, it's fine.

    It should be avoided on a defense gun, since you may have to fire with the pistol tucked in the "retention position." Shooting like this with a compensated pistol may direct jets of hot gas into your eyes. Fighting blind is not a good thing.
    Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

    Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

    All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

  3. #3
    Dynamik1's Avatar
    Dynamik1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pittsboro, NC
    Posts
    281
    Damn good point! Lucid thinking prevails!!

  4. #4
    Baldy's Avatar
    Baldy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Port St.John,FL.
    Posts
    6,741
    Mike said it all right there. If I was shooting in a league that allowed it them I would have one. Never for defense though.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

compensated glock benefits

,

difference between compensated and non guns

,

difference between compensated pist and non compensated

Click on a term to search for related topics.