Not lecturing, and no offense intended, just pointing out that the battlefield is different from police work and may require different weapons. Nothing at all wrong with police work - my own father was a cop and went to Desert Storm as an MP.
I haven't been in combat, and have never implied that I have. But I have talked rather extensively to literally dozens of very recent veterans of the fights in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Since I'll be in the The 'Stan in the spring, I naturally am very interested in what they say. I base my opinions largely on what they are telling me, which seems to have little in common with the conventional wisdom I read on the internet or in gun magazines.
Maybe my current opinions will change once I get in-country, but as it stands now, I just don't believe that soldiers are as concerned and obsessed with .45s (or 6.8mm rifles, or whatever) as gun enthusiasts would like to believe.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

How can you be so sure they weren't there in 1913? I can remember reading about them in high school history. Bet you couldn't find it in a history book today. I guess that's why you take a negitive outlook on what I said. I tell you what your a young computer savy guy how about you prove that it wasn't there and not just here say or your opinion.
