U are just determined to bring the caliber wars to our website, huh

Shot placement is what counts, and 9mm and 45 are fine - I also prefer 9mm because I can afford to shoot more often. If cost was not a factor, I'd shoot more 45. Those two rounds are fine for me, and have withstood the test of time.

+1 With Ship.

SW summed it up pretty well. 9 and 45 do it just fine for me.

I am a diehard .45 fan. With the exceptions of the DE and .22 pistols, everything I plan to buy will be a .45. If it's not offered in a .45, I ain't buying.

Just my .02.

dladd

Little different twist on the caliber war.........


I've never seen the point in the 357 Sig and 10mm personally. Just my opinion.

They all suck about the same to function in weak actions.

Originally Posted by jwkimber45

Little different twist on the caliber war.........


I've never seen the point in the 357 Sig and 10mm personally. Just my opinion.

My next gun may be a 9mm because of the affordablity factor.

Well, we see what's winning in the poll....

I didn't vote. I think there's little practical difference between any of them, except the 10mm in its hotter guise. Then it's okay as an outdoorsman's gun, though still inferior to .44 Magnum.

I do think we have too many overlapping calibers in both pistols and rifles, and innovate for innovation's sake, rather than for practical purposes. There's precious little that can be done with a .40 S&W, a .357 SIG, or a .45 GAP that hasn't been done with a .45 ACP, a .38 Super, or a 9mm.

well I like my .45's cuz they make watermelons go "POOF" when ya use hollowpoints

Originally Posted by scooter

well I like my .45's cuz they make watermelons go "POOF" when ya use hollowpoints

Well then I guess that ends this debate. I agree completely. When ever you can shoot something and it:

A: Makes a big mess
B: Makes a big BOOM!
C: Scars the hell out of the person next to you
D: Makes your wife roll her eyes
E: Makes you laugh like you did when you were ten years old after you super
glued your little brothers fingers together.


It is considered a success.

Originally Posted by Shipwreck

U are just determined to bring the caliber wars to our website, huh

Shot placement is what counts, and 9mm and 45 are fine - I also prefer 9mm because I can afford to shoot more often. If cost was not a factor, I'd shoot more 45. Those two rounds are fine for me, and have withstood the test of time.

No cal. wars here I'm right that ends it. It is great to be a majority of 1

No warring please!! I've had enough of that elsewhere. Everybody has their favorites - variety is the spice of life. I just wonder that if the situation were reversed... say the Sig and 10mm had a 100 year headstart, would people vote the other way. I think a lot of it is just loyalty and the 9mm and .45 have had more time to build that. (but I'd still take a 357 sig over a 9 any day!! )

:smt044:smt044:smt044

OK, all U guys better learn the truth - the .25ACP is THE best round. All others are posers

Huh?????????

Originally Posted by Shipwreck

OK, all U guys better learn the truth - the .25ACP is THE best round. All others are posers

I disagree Shipwreck. I think the .22 short is the best defensive round.

Your all wrong, the 44. cap and ball is the best.

No, I've re-evaluated the situation. Rock throwing is where it is at!!!!

A rock! How primitive. You need a high tech launching system.

Originally Posted by Shipwreck

No, I've re-evaluated the situation. Rock throwing is where it is at!!!!

GREAT now they're gonna try and pass a shitload of rock control laws and Ill havta pave the driveway................

Dang you threadjackers!!! I'll post this poll again in 100 years and then we'll see who laughs last!!!! ................. LOL!!
By the way, who makes holsters for that rock chucker?