You're not being a dick, you just have an opinion. I base my statement on facts which I have observed. While no gun is going to be 100% reliable, it has been my experience that of my carry guns, my Glocks have the best record to date. I am not a super Glock fanboy... I just recognize what I see and experience. In my carry stable, there are presently three manufacturers represented. Of course I have other handguns, but I have chosen these to be in my carry stable for a reason. Some have never failed to feed, fire or eject. But of the ones I have shot the most, the three Glocks I have in my carry stable are at the top of the heap.
Some guns have peculiar quirks such as sensitivity to dirty magazines which tend to keep the slide from locking open after the last round. Others are sensitive to ammo and are only reliable feeders with certain bullet designs. Neither of these quirks are deal killers and as long as you take the necessary steps (keeping mags clean, using correct ammo), the guns function properly. Reliability is a wide umbrella so when one considers this term, one is wise to also consider a host of variables which could fall under that umbrella.
Some people are so set on Glocks, they ignore all other options out there. Some are like this with 1911's, believing anything that doesn't have a hammer, is not a single action, and can't be carried cocked and locked is not worth considering. And some wouldn't give two cents for a "plastic" gun. I don't fall within any of those categories because I don't want to cheat myself out of something that just might wind up being the best handgun I have ever encountered. I did say I wasn't a Glock fanboy... right? I like Glocks. I also like a mess of other guns. Glock just happens to be one of them. I have carried Kahr's, a Browning, M&P's, Kel-Tec's, Rugers, Taurus, older Smith and Wessons, and others which seem to escape my memory. It's just that at this time, my prime carry gun is a Glock. Who knows. In a month or a year, that could change.