View Poll Results: WHICH WOULD YOU BUY AND WHY

Voters
169. You may not vote on this poll
  • beretta NANO

    21 12.43%
  • kahr CM9

    24 14.20%
  • kel-tec PF9

    6 3.55%
  • kimber SOLO

    11 6.51%
  • ruger LC9

    34 20.12%
  • S&W SHIELD

    45 26.63%
  • sig 938

    20 11.83%
  • taurus PT709

    8 4.73%
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 92
  1. #1
    hideit's Avatar
    hideit is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    west chester ohio
    Posts
    1,498

    Which slim 9mm pocket pistol would you buy

    Which would you buy and why?

  2. #2
    chessail77's Avatar
    chessail77 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    White Mtns. in AZ
    Posts
    1,349
    S&W Shield....numerous reviews from actual owners are solid, lifetime warranty and excellent customer service, hard to find but seems worth it

  3. #3
    NWMarc's Avatar
    NWMarc is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2
    My 9mm Shield, very concealable and easy to carry. Not much bigger than many of the 380 pistols

  4. #4
    hideit's Avatar
    hideit is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    west chester ohio
    Posts
    1,498
    lets keep the votes rolling in

  5. #5
    mwbackus is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    12

    Re: Which slim 9mm pocket pistol would you buy

    Kahr PM9

  6. #6
    Ala Tom is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    84

    None of these!

    Why a Pocket Pistol? Won't 'small' do? I thought I wanted this type of pistol a few months ago and went looking. Many of these had not yet come on the market. I tried the 709 Slim and hated it. Couldn't hit anything with it. Its slim size made it difficult to grasp well so my shots were off due to the effects of bad grip and recoil. I tried an M&P9c but it wasn't as smooth as I expected. Recently I considered the Nano but rejected it after hearing reports that "limp wristing" was a common problem due to difficulty in gripping it.

    The best 9 mm I found was the Ruger SR9c which did indeed fit in my pocket and was easy to grip firmly and shoot accurately. But when I went in to buy it, they had a SR40c (identical size and shape, more power) and only about $20 more. I bought the Ruger SR40C instead. But I use an IWB rather than just stuffing it in my pocket. I have stuffed it in my pocket for a short time as when walking the dog late at night on a weekend when there is commotion in the neighborhood.

    I am considering a small gun again for use in an ankle holster in the car. Maybe a Glock 26 or 27. I shot the 26 well and liked its feel, just not as much as I liked the feel of the SR9C. Can I shoot the 26 (9mm) more accurately than the 27 (.40)? Maybe they are about the same for a Center of Mass shot. I feel if there are no other factors in a trade-off, a 40 is preferable than a 9 for defense.

  7. #7
    berettatoter's Avatar
    berettatoter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,260
    I had to go with the Nano! I do not own one, but I did shoot one and fell in love. Now, to come up with the cash to be able to add it to my other Berettas! Damn, that's hard to do these days.

  8. #8
    ponzer04's Avatar
    ponzer04 is online now Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    419
    I went S&W due to the fact that I own an LC9. the LC9 is a very good pistol and I shoot it well. I think I would prefer the S&W or that could just be a grass is greener on the other side thing. I do not like the P938, my wife has one and the ambi safety gets in my way.

  9. #9
    Seminoles is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9

    Re: Which slim 9mm pocket pistol would you buy

    I just bought one. A Kahr PM9.

  10. #10
    Ricky59's Avatar
    Ricky59 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    83
    I vote ... Kahr..
    PM9 is my primary carry ..

  11. #11
    prof_fate is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    181
    Have not shot any of these. The kel tec is cheap and I"ve heard good things about it. I have an MP full size so the shield is tempting and it doesnt' seem too small to me. Guna and Ammo this month reviews them and the taurus did well.
    I got to hold, but not yet shoot, a LCR and wow, it weighed nothing. Only 5 rounds and I'd wonder how 357 would feel coming out of it but it's very tempting to toss in a pocket.

  12. #12
    swany66675's Avatar
    swany66675 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    65

    Re: Which slim 9mm pocket pistol would you buy

    I'm kind of doing the same thing but I'm trying to decide between the Sig p938 or the nano. I like both but looks go to the Sig, just makes me smile looking at it.

  13. #13
    Shipwreck's Avatar
    Shipwreck is online now HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Beretta City, Texas
    Posts
    10,822
    S&W SHield 9mm.

    In fact, I liked it so much, I spent 2.5 months looking for a second one!


  14. #14
    mwbackus is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    12

    Re: Which slim 9mm pocket pistol would you buy

    Shield is very nice shooter, very concealable and has a sweet trigger for the price. If you can afford a bit more the Kahr CW9 has an even better trigger... Spend significantly more and you can have the Kahr P9...nicer finish, match barrel, and the sweet Kahr trigger which I believe is the best trigger of all CC pistols on the market.

  15. #15
    Pukindog12 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    8
    I voted CM9 but I'd suggest a CW9 instead. Virtually same size as a PF9, a 3.6" barrel, and no safety which is why I prefer it over the Shield.

  16. #16
    Dragonheart is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    29
    The Shield is not really a pocket pistol. It is an accurate, reliable compact handgun that fits the hand well. It is also very hard to find in 9mm and the 40 has a biting recoil. The Walther PPS is basically the same size, but the Walther is thinner and the factory trigger on the Walther is not as light as the Shield. Both these handguns can be carried in a large, cargo pants style pocket, but are better suited to a holster.

    As far as pocket handguns the Sig P-238 in 380 and the Sig P-938 in 9mm are the ultimate. Both are small reliable and capable of putting all round in a 4 inch circle at 15 yards. Most of the other pocket handguns fall way short on accuracy and reliability. I personally prefer the 9mm because of the additional power and bullet selection of the 9mm.

  17. #17
    Tuefelhunden is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    554
    Of those I have personally tried I think the Walther PPS is the best sub-compact slim 9mm but it is not a pocket gun mostly due to it's shape. Squared off rear of slide is not real user friendly easing out of a pants pocket. Excels as a very discrete IWB option. Kind of in a niche by it's self. Lot of exciting new offerings in pocket nines out there but I think the PM9/CW9 still reins supreme taking into account all the variables such as weight, size, shape, thickness, smooth edges, capacity, trigger, safety, sights, etc. Two biggest weaknesses of the CM/PM are the mags like to ditch rounds into your pocket if not in a mag carrier and the slide release can be a little sharp. Easily fixed at home with a little dehorning. Nano and Shield are both intriguing but I have no trigger time with either. For some reason the Nano really appeals to me but I have no rational reason for it. I found the PF9 too much to handle but loved the Ruger LCP so the LC9 may be just enough heavier than the PF9 to be a good option if one can look beyond the safety on a heavy DAO trigger coupled with a mag disconnect. I'm rambling but my votes goes to the Kahr.

  18. #18
    Russ is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by hideit View Post
    Which would you buy and why?
    I owned 3 of the slim 9mm in your poll. (Kahr CM9, Beretta Nano & S&W Shield)

    Shield is the most reliable with all ammo and after 8 months pocket packing there is no wear marks. The Nano showed excessive wear especially the hood of the barrel after 200 rounds.

    I also shot the Kimber Solo and it was a disaster from the first round.

    Russ

  19. #19
    Russ is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonheart View Post
    The Shield is not really a pocket pistol. It is an accurate, reliable compact handgun that fits the hand well. It is also very hard to find in 9mm and the 40 has a biting recoil. The Walther PPS is basically the same size, but the Walther is thinner and the factory trigger on the Walther is not as light as the Shield. Both these handguns can be carried in a large, cargo pants style pocket, but are better suited to a holster.

    As far as pocket handguns the Sig P-238 in 380 and the Sig P-938 in 9mm are the ultimate. Both are small reliable and capable of putting all round in a 4 inch circle at 15 yards. Most of the other pocket handguns fall way short on accuracy and reliability. I personally prefer the 9mm because of the additional power and bullet selection of the 9mm.
    Dragonheart:

    I have been pocket packing my Shield 9mm for the last 8 months 10 hours per day in 34 x 32 pleated slacks.

    I did change out the stock sights for XS Big Dot Night Sights partly because the stock rear sight is angled such that it would catch on my pocket when I did quick practice draw.

    The rear XS sight is low profile making a quick pocket draw A-OK

    I owned and pocket packed the Kahr CM9 and Beretta Nano and there really was not much difference except the Kahr was 3 oz lighter which I noticed at first but now I am use to the added weight now which is due to the extra round for the Shield (7+1) and better quality rails and poly.

    There is a reason you can't find a Shield but when you do it is worth it. Dollar for dollar you can't beat the Shield.

    After shooting most of the slim 9mm on this poll the biggest disappointment and ripoff in my opinion is the Kimber Solo. Beauty is skin deep for this gun because as soon as I shot her the ugliness in the over priced $600 gun came out. Very disappointing.

    The Beretta Nano is the runner up for disappointment. I shot over a case of assorted rounds through my Nano and it never was reliable enough to call her a ccw and several others posted similar comments on the Beretta forum.

    I also shot the Sig 238. Very nice 380 but she was not 100% reliable and not as accurate as the Nano or Shield.

    For me it comes down to reliability and after shooting more than 2 cases of ammo through the Kahr CM9, Beretta Nano and Shield no one can talk me out of voting for the Shield.

    Russ

  20. #20
    hideit's Avatar
    hideit is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    west chester ohio
    Posts
    1,498
    Russ: I have read many posts on this and other forums and reviews VERY similiar to your post

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

9mm pocket guns
,

9mm pocket pistol

,

best 9mm pocket pistol

,

best pocket 9mm

,
best pocket 9mm pistol
,

best pocket pistol

,
best pocket pistol 9mm
,

pocket 9mm

,
pocket 9mm pistols
,
pocket pistol reviews
,
s&w 669 .9mm all alloy pocket pistols
,
slim 9mm pistol
Click on a term to search for related topics.