Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52
  1. #26
    mtn.shooter is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    27
    I am responding to this post only because not 9 months ago I registered here for the purpose of asking the same exact question. The decision to buy a handgun was just as much my wife`s idea as mine. We have had some home invasions here like everywhere and we also take it hiking as we live in mountain lion/ bear country. Like most folks, 9 months ago was a REALLY tough time to come up with cash. I went to a local gunshop w/ the intent to buy a HP 9MM. While had had one in stock, he tried to upsell me to a Ruger P-95 for $300.00. I had exactly $250.00 in cash in my pocket and that was it! I took it out laid it on the counter and said, "if you want me to buy the Ruger, this is what I have otherwise, I`ll take the High Point". I now own a Ruger P-95 that I am happy with, but I would have just as easily walked with the HP and a few extra rounds/mags. Bottom line is that either weapon has a waaaaay higher chance of saving my life than my previous home protection....a Louisville slugger and I am NOT kidding!

  2. Ads
  3. #27
    Packard is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    1,017
    Here is a write up: Hi-Point Firearms

    It is a blow back pistol in large caliber so it needs a very heavy spring. The percieved recoil should be fairly significant.

    My problem is that there is ugly, then there is UGLY, and then there is too-ugly-to-f**k, and this falls into the last catagory.

  4. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Northern UT
    Posts
    457
    If I needed a functional gun that i don't care whether it gets scratched or beat up looking, I would buy a Hi-point. Ugly, cheap looking, Yes. But a good gun for tackle box duty, survival kit or any other job where you wouldn't risk your (insert premium brand here). Once you get past the looks, I understand that they are accurate and reliable. They also reputedly have a great warranty and customer service. I've thought of getting one just for the heck of it. For the price, how bad can it be? You can always sell it on. People that own them seem surprisingly happy with them.

  5. #29
    Sniper6473's Avatar
    Sniper6473 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    25
    Most important thing when you buy any gun is to run between 300-500 target rounds and some of the hollowpoints that you will be carrying...

    If you do that and there are no problems, the weapon is reliable.. I do the same with my HK's

  6. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    160
    I'm a very new gun owner, and when I was shopping about a month ago I asked about Hi-Point (because they're cheap) at a large local shop. They don't sell them, and they don't even allow people to bring them to their indoor range. They would turn away business just to avoid Hi-Point in any way. That was enough for me. That wasn't the only "off-brand" he mentioned they were weary about, but that one stuck in my mind as the worst.

  7. #31
    TheReaper's Avatar
    TheReaper is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    333
    If Hi-Points were so good then we would all own one.

  8. #32
    dosborn's Avatar
    dosborn is offline Member HGF Gold Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    882
    Quote Originally Posted by TheReaper View Post
    If Hi-Points were so good then we would all own one.
    +1

    That's the truth. Example: "Everyone should have at least one Glock". You never hear, "Everyone should own at least one Hi-Point". I would rather spend the $150 on ammo or a good EDC rig for my Taurus.

  9. #33
    wiredgeorge is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Mico TX
    Posts
    9
    Interesting thread. Great to hear the opinions from so many folks who have no first hand info but have "heard things"... I personally won't comment on a handgun if I don't own the model OR haven't handled/shot the thing extensively. Opinions based on rumor and hearsay are absolutely useless.

  10. #34
    recoilguy's Avatar
    recoilguy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,311
    I have to disagree whole heartedly.....the basic premise of your agruement seems sound, however to paint with as broad a brush as you are is as much hearsay and useless as you imply conversley. I have never touched or used a Chinesse Air Wrench. Nor will I. However one of my friends who does the same type of work I do and expects similar quality in the things he buys has purchased one of the more inexpensive brands. (The brand escapes me but if I called him he would tell me it). From his experiance and knowing his criteria, I would not ever have to hold ,touch or use one to know I would be able to say the brand he bought is inferior, and that I would never recomend it to anyone serious about using tools. It even had a warantee and man was it affordable. (although it fit the coupling and went vertttttttt vertttttt when you pressed the trigger)

    There are just too many other good quality tool that can be had, that I would not risk nor would I suggest anyone else risk buying one just because it cost next to nothing.............really why do you think that is? I can say with complete confidence and a high degree of authority do not buy that brand of air wrench even though I have never touched one in my life.

    I have touched Hi Points and I wished I hadn't. They have a good waranty and are dirt freakin cheap. That is not the critera I choose to use when I buy a weapon.

    RCG

  11. #35
    wiredgeorge is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Mico TX
    Posts
    9
    The logic of your argument escapes me... Junk air tool? The Hi-Point is a junk air tool in a pistol? Why? Because it is made in China? You have handled a Hi-Point? Why not describe the negative things you found when you cycled rounds through it. Did fail to feed? Fail to eject? Sensitive to certain ammo? Shot poor patterns? Nope, not many arguments of this sort. All the negative arguments, for the most part, have been my buddy this, or the guy at the range that... The original poster asked for FIRST hand experience with a Hi-Point. The main knock has been CHEAP. They are inexpensive but then so are Taurus, Bersa, Kel-Tec, etc. I have all of them bashed as "cheap"; "I would never trust my life". I think comments on a pistol site would be a whole lot more useful if folks would just stick to what they actually know; not what they think or have heard or somebody else told them. And the comment about the gun shop/range won't allow Hi-Points on-range? Geesh, bet you came out owning a Kimber. That is normally what they push as the profit margin would be just a tad higher I suspect. Another interesting point is that when the Kimber fails to fire, jams and won't eject NO ONE says a word otherwise they look like a spending ninny.

  12. #36
    recoilguy's Avatar
    recoilguy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,311
    I was afraid my logic would escape you.........oh well.....your Kimber bashing with no specifics other then profit margin (which everyone knows is evil) is admirable; especially when compared to the lowlife Hi Point Bashing you say has no validity with out specifics except they are cheap.

    This was not meant to be an arguement and it will not become one. When ever anything breaks down to money it only causes resentment. Just look at Congress. Thank God they were intellegent enough to extend the tax breaks to all Americans.

    RCG

  13. #37
    Wheezer is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    10
    I'm considering buying one also, I've done some research on them and realized people love to hate them. So I look on youtube and watched a series of some guys trying to blow one up. They threw it, beat it with a hammer, ran it over with a truck, ran everything through it including black powder, hammered a 3/8 bolt in the barrel and shot it out. In the end they had to hold the bolt in with a C clamp so it wouldn't budge and finally seceded, so needless to say you should be fine with the HP. Good luck.

  14. #38
    sgms is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    can be found in Arizona or Ohio most of the time
    Posts
    370
    For the money I'll go with a Makarov. It's not a 9x19 nato but a 9x18 soviet round ammo around and not stupid high priced.

  15. #39
    HK Dan is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    250
    Have you seen the inside of those things? They look like they were machined by a blind chimp with palsy. I can't believe they function, which is a tribute to their loose tolerences. Yes, I have shot them, and no they most certainly are NOT what I would call "accurate". They will put rounds in the general area where you want them, but let's not make a Bullseye match gun out of these things.

    I was given a HP .380 the size of a 1911 and the weight of a similarly sized piece of depleted uranium. I duracoated it pink and we used it as a gag gift at our annual banquet, putting a UTG red dot on it and calling it "the next Open gun".

    The gun is a cheap slug thrower. If that's what you want, more power to ya. If on the other hand you intend to defend yourself and your loved ones in a serious way, get a serious gun.

    Dan

  16. #40
    group17 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by HK Dan View Post
    Have you seen the inside of those things? They look like they were machined by a blind chimp with palsy. I can't believe they function, which is a tribute to their loose tolerences. Yes, I have shot them, and no they most certainly are NOT what I would call "accurate". They will put rounds in the general area where you want them, but let's not make a Bullseye match gun out of these things.

    I was given a HP .380 the size of a 1911 and the weight of a similarly sized piece of depleted uranium. I duracoated it pink and we used it as a gag gift at our annual banquet, putting a UTG red dot on it and calling it "the next Open gun".

    Dan
    The size of the 380 is the same as the 9mm not small. As far as the weight and size it's still less than a SIG P229.

    Genitron.com: Comparing 2 Guns|CF-380|P229|

    Must have been fun putting a red dot on it since it does not have a rail.

    "accurate" is the person shooting the gun with practice IMO.

    To each his own.

  17. #41
    recoilguy's Avatar
    recoilguy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,311
    Mounting a red dot to a Hi Point would be pretty easy especially if you didnt plan to shot it. Tap a weaver rail into the top of the slide.........put it on.

    Practice with a gun will make you more accurate with that gun. But it will never make a gun that is less accurate by nature equal to one that is inherantly more accurate.

    I don't know about the accuracy of the .380 Hi Point but if it is as accurate as the tolerances of it assembly it could possibly have moments of accuarcy.

    RCG

  18. #42
    HK Dan is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    250
    Thank you! That gun will never be fired again (it could be), but let's face it--it's pink and it's ugly. To say that it weights less than a Sig isn't giving much credit. Sigs are HEAVY.

    Finally "Accurate" isn't necessarily the person shooting the gun. You're assuming the gun can outshoot the shooter. This one can't. These are short lived pot metal guns and should be looked at with the same level of disdain as styrofoam cups compared to fine china.

  19. #43
    DonW is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1

    Hi-Point reliability

    I bought a Hi-Point .380 from a local pawn shop nine years ago for $70.00. My daughter and I took it to the range every Thursday while she was being home-schooled. It seems the vote for ugly is as consistant as is my vote for reliability. I've never had any failures to fire that were the gun's fault. The barrel, on our model was fixed and if the sights weren't changed, the point of impact only changed because of the variety of ammunition I used. My point is this: If this firearm was being used to rob my family at gun point, I have no doubt that it will fire with every squeeze of the trigger. I bought this one so it will never be used in this scenerio. My family is important to me, so I buy the best I can afford. I also practice as much as possible to prove to myself that my purchase was adaquate. If you are questioning the ability of a Hi-Point pistol to fire accurately, practice, . . . practice, . . . practice, you will answer your own questions reliably with first person facts.

  20. #44
    shakinghorizons is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by DonW View Post
    I bought a Hi-Point .380 from a local pawn shop nine years ago for $70.00. My daughter and I took it to the range every Thursday while she was being home-schooled. It seems the vote for ugly is as consistant as is my vote for reliability. I've never had any failures to fire that were the gun's fault. The barrel, on our model was fixed and if the sights weren't changed, the point of impact only changed because of the variety of ammunition I used. My point is this: If this firearm was being used to rob my family at gun point, I have no doubt that it will fire with every squeeze of the trigger. I bought this one so it will never be used in this scenerio. My family is important to me, so I buy the best I can afford. I also practice as much as possible to prove to myself that my purchase was adaquate. If you are questioning the ability of a Hi-Point pistol to fire accurately, practice, . . . practice, . . . practice, you will answer your own questions reliably with first person facts.
    I have to agree 100% with this post. I have owned my .380 for at least 9 years as well and have put thousands (over 10k) rounds through it, and I bought it used. It goes bang everytime, with any type of ammo. I have heard numerous horror stories about hi point, but I do not have any. Matter of fact, it is sometimes my concealed carry.

  21. #45
    BowerR64 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    92
    I bought a hipoint with the intent to fix it up. I wanted to paint it and do little "hopup" things to it that i had seen on youtube videos and on the hipoint forum.

    SHelled out $215. for the gun and a 10 round mag. Got it home and checked it all out found the feed ramp was painted. Looking back at my other semi autos none of them had a painted feed ramp. In my mind this is an over spray from the factory cheap build quality maybe?

    SO i begin to polisht eh barrel and the feed ramp. I get it to a pretty good shine


    put it all back together head to the range and fire a little over a box of shells threw it. It didnt have any issues i was pretty happy with it other then the recoil was a tad harsh for a 9mm i felt. All plastic grip and frame cant expect much.

    I tear it all down and clean it and all my work has gone out the window.


    After just over 50 rounds and the feed ramp looks like i took a hammer to it!


    I think the paint was a protective finish of some sort. The barrel is steel but the ejection port and the feed ramp are pot metal. So soft that the lead from the round actually dents the feed ramp! and the brass looks as if it took BIG huge gouges from it as well.

    So what have i learned? when this goes back im not going to remove the factory paint. I think its part of the design of the gun!

  22. #46
    mmkkpro is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3
    I will give you a little feedback on hi point,I own a jhp have for couple years,it has been dependable,reliable,and is affordable.I also own a colt NMGC,and I shoot my hi point much more often,i like the feel of it,the warranty is unmatched in the industry,its made in america that means something to me.Ive kept it clean and have no problems to report to this point after approx.800 rounds through it,ive shot ball,hollow point,wad cutter,no faliure to feed,no lock ups,ya pull the trigger it goes boom,and I dare say its every bit if not more accurate than my colt.The barrel is made onto the frame it doesnt flop around I think that helps its accuracy,for the money they cant be beat in my own experence,every manufacturer has had a lemon or two leave the shop,agian based on my personal usage of a hi point cant say anything bad about ig,i am a stone mason for 32 years so the weight of it doesnt bother me,it looks intimidating,main thing is to maintain it regularly,im taking a ccw course this weekend dont know if I will carry it or not,but it has its place by my side,never shot the 9mm ive heard good and bad,so in my opinion its not expensive and it does what its suppose to do.I hope this helps you personal experence is priceless.

  23. #47
    nbk13nw's Avatar
    nbk13nw is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    81

    Re: Hi-point firearms

    Paint does not prevent dents, dings or gouging of the ramp

  24. #48
    grabo172's Avatar
    grabo172 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    10
    I actually just got rid of my C9 today...

    My opinion, it is a decent gun that fills a niche. The niche is an inexpensive firearm for those who can't afford something much more than $300 (mine was $160 new a few years back)

    I bought it a few years ago when I needed a sidearm for a hunting trip in Mountain lion country. I didn't have much money, so Hi Point fit the situation.

    It fires well, only have had a few failures (I accredit those mostly to user error and not so great ammo). It was accurate as any handgun I've shot and its weight made for a manageable recoil.

    I sold it because my financial situation is much better now and I have replaced it with a Nano, Sig P938, and a 24/7 G2. I figured I'd let it go to someone who needs an affordable firearm as I did a few years back.

  25. #49
    valent is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    8
    At this time Zastava Tokarevs in 9 and 7.62 are selling under $300. All steel military grade weapon, much more reliable than Hi-Point, 10 round capacity, very thin
    and concealable.

  26. #50
    MCMAR is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by kg333 View Post
    Hi-Point Firearms are not generally well thought of, although they have some staunch supporters. If you need to save money, I'd recommend going used or surplus. For a similar price range ($220), I ended up going with a surplus CZ-82; I've been pretty happy with it overall. If I'd had about $400-500 to spend, I probably would have been looking around for one of the Gen 3 Glock 19s. Just make sure you do your homework on the guns you look at, and you should be fine.

    KG
    You went with a used foreign made gun that could prove costly to get parts for...if you can find any. And no warranty...what you get is what you get and I am glad that you are overall happy with. For about $125 you could have purchased a new 380 caliber handgun that has a lifetime unlimited warranty. In stead of buying something could have problems that could difficult to take care of why not get something that is brand new and has a lifetime warranty..

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

hi point 45 pistol review

,

hi point firearms quality

,

hi point firearms.net

,

hi point forum

,
hi point guns quality
,

hi point pistol quality

,
hi point quality
,
hi-point quality
,

hi-pointfirearms.net

,
highpoint firearm forums
,

quality of hi point firearms

,

www.hi-pointfirearms.net

Click on a term to search for related topics.