View Poll Results: Kahr PM9 vs. Walther PPS

Voters
66. You may not vote on this poll
  • Walther PPS

    24 36.36%
  • Kahr PM9

    42 63.64%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1
    cbrgator's Avatar
    cbrgator is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    81

    Kahr PM9 vs. Walther PPS

    Which of these is better for CCW? Please provide me insight as to why in addition to voting. Thanks!

  2. Ads
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Tacoma, Wa
    Posts
    686
    PM9 has a way smoother trigger

  4. #3
    James NM's Avatar
    James NM is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,091
    How are you going to carry it?

    If I was looking to pocket or ankle carry, I'd go with the PM9 because of its smaller size & weight.

    If I was looking to carry IWB or OWB, I'd go with the PPS, as its larger size & weight should improve shootability.

    But why compare the PM9 to the PPS? They are in different size categories. A more valid comparison would be between the P9 and the PPS. And even then, the P9 is smaller and lighter than the PPS, even though the P9 still has a longer barrel.

    I believe the PM9 to be better suited for deep concealment, while the P9 and/or the PPS are better suited for traditional CC.

  5. #4
    Hollander is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    a little south of Atlanta
    Posts
    97
    Cannot vote since I have both. PPS for owb carry and PM9 for pocket carry in hot weather. I like them both for their separate purposes.

  6. #5
    cbrgator's Avatar
    cbrgator is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    81
    You really think the difference in size is that significant between the PPS and PM9? I know there is a difference but I never found it to be THAT significant.

  7. #6
    James NM's Avatar
    James NM is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,091
    Quote Originally Posted by cbrgator View Post
    You really think the difference in size is that significant between the PPS and PM9? I know there is a difference but I never found it to be THAT significant.
    Have you handled and/or shot them?

    The PPS is almost 20% longer and almost 40% heavier than the PM9. Yes, IMO, that is significant.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Tacoma, Wa
    Posts
    686

  9. #8
    Bisley's Avatar
    Bisley is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    1,416
    Quote Originally Posted by cbrgator View Post
    Which of these is better for CCW? Please provide me insight as to why in addition to voting. Thanks!
    I like Kahrs a lot, and currently own a K-9. I have had a PM-9 and a P-45, both great guns.

    But for my personal use, I would likely choose the Walther, simply because of the ability to change the grip size, and therefore lengthen the trigger reach. The reach on a Kahr is very short, which makes it ideal for people with medium or smaller hands.

    However, I have largish hands with long fingers, and all of the Kahrs require me to adjust my grip and shooting technique to accommodate that. I have never had the opportunity to try the PPS with the large size grip insert, but I think it would work because my P-22 with similar setup works.

    As for quality, I would rate the Kahr slightly higher...just my personal opinion.

  10. #9
    falchunt's Avatar
    falchunt is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    453
    I voted Walther, for similar reasons as Bisley. I prefer the feel of the Walther over the Kahr, although both are good guns.

  11. #10
    Sonny Boy's Avatar
    Sonny Boy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    87
    Had a Kahr PM9 and had feeding problems and a peening issue. Sent it back to the factory and they replaced the barrel, but never seemed right.

    Walther no feeding problems at all. The Kahr has been sold, still have the Walther.
    Last edited by Sonny Boy; 10-13-2009 at 10:08 PM.

  12. #11
    Panther's Avatar
    Panther is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Charlotte,NC
    Posts
    34
    I considered and handled both. I went with the PM9. No regrets. Very smooth trigger, as accurate at 7 yards (considered max confrontational distance) as my 4" FNP9. Out of the box a champ. 700 rounds not a FTF, or any other problem. Low recoil for it's weight and size. I just plain love this gun

  13. #12
    SIGness is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Suburban Detroit
    Posts
    60
    The PPS hands down for me. I've got a PPS in .40 s&w, and I've shot a PM9. PPS has better ergos IMO, shoots more accurate for me. And I just prefer the Walther name over Kahr TBH.

  14. #13
    tateb24's Avatar
    tateb24 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    53
    This is tough, both guns are very reliable and excellent shooters, I am not sure

  15. #14
    Nerostarr's Avatar
    Nerostarr is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    35
    I had a PPS and it was a good gun, but the grip was not right for my hand. It also had a good bit of recoil that I did not like. I have since purchased a Kahr CW9 and it is an easier gun to shoot, better trigger and that equals better groups. Both guns are very good, the Kahr just works better for me.

  16. #15
    oak1971's Avatar
    oak1971 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    354
    Kahr

    I will take one of these,


  17. #16
    Pat Az's Avatar
    Pat Az is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oro Valley, Arizona
    Posts
    40
    I went with the PPS, very pleased with it and no regrets.

  18. #17
    dondavis3's Avatar
    dondavis3 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Dallas / Fort Worth Texas Area
    Posts
    1,871
    I love my Walther PPK/S



    It's a dream to shoot and I've carried it concealed a lot.

    I've never carried the Kahr - I've heard good things about it (light / smaller, etc,)


  19. #18
    Handgun World's Avatar
    Handgun World is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    79
    This is the first time I've ever heard anyone say the recoil on the PPS was bad. I dont own one, but shot 100 rounds through a range rental and was very surprised at the low recoil for a small and light gun. If you shoot a PPS compared to a PM9, recoil should be noticeably snappier with PM9. I own a PM9 because Walther wasn't out yet when I bought it.

    Only problem I see with PPS is lack of choices for night sights. Only one source that I know of.

  20. #19
    Bowhunter2001's Avatar
    Bowhunter2001 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11
    I hope the PM9. I have one on the way!

  21. #20
    recoilguy's Avatar
    recoilguy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    1,311
    I picked the Kahr....for CCW it is small light and accurate. Conceals easy and still feels like a gun in your hand. I am a big fan of Kahr so this is not an unbiased opinion.

    RCG

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

kahr pm9 vs ppk
,
kahr pm9 vs pps
,
kahr pm9 vs walther ppk
,

kahr pm9 vs walther pps

,

pm9 vs pps

,
ppk vs pps
,

pps vs pm9

,

walther ppk vs kahr pm9

,
walther pps recoil
,
walther pps vs
,
walther pps vs kahr cw9
,

walther pps vs kahr pm9

Click on a term to search for related topics.