Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    tedtf is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    11

    CCW decision? Sig 239 or Walther PPS

    Looking for a 9mm concealed carry. I think I have narrowed it down to 2 - Sig 239 or Walther pps. I really like the slim profile of the PPS, but am not sure how comfortable the narrow grip is after some range time. Any own the PPS adn can give feedback on the grip?

    Any advice?

  2. #2
    jeffreybehr's Avatar
    jeffreybehr is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    97
    The PPS was too small for my medium-large hands. I had to file the mag-release 'fingers' so that they wouldn't gouge my triggerfinger...PPS mag latch is (was!) sharp!

    Also, magazines are quite expensive, at least compared with prices of much-larger Glock mags, and I couldn't find the vaporware extra-capacity mag.

    See also Walther PPS

    So...more expensive than it should be, and harder to shoot. It was NOT the CC pistol for me.

  3. #3
    D-Ric902's Avatar
    D-Ric902 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    37
    I went with the 239. It's heavier but the PPS felt like a toy gun to me.

  4. #4
    SaltyDog's Avatar
    SaltyDog is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    691
    I like my P239 SAS Gen 2. I chose the 40 S&W. If I want to make it a 9mm I only need to purchase a drop in barrel and magazines- same also for 357.

    The 239 is heavier but this helps to reduce the felt recoil. It is also very concealable with the only drawback being - to some - the single stack magazine capacity.

    Great gun and fires like a champ.

  5. #5
    DennisE is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    18
    239 SAS Gen2 in your favorite caliber! Handy, ergonamic, easy to shoot, hits what you aim at, repeats with great dispatch! Dennis

  6. #6
    dondavis3's Avatar
    dondavis3 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Dallas / Fort Worth Texas Area
    Posts
    1,871
    I own and carry either a Walther PPK/S or a Sig P230 or P232 (kinda which ever the wife doesn't grab 1st) all is .380 (9mm short).

    I prefer the Sig's because of no safety to fiddle with and I put very nice Hogue grips on them and I like the looks & handling better.

    Both brands of guns are way above norm - very high quality - You really can't go wrong with either.

    For cold weather I carry my Kimber .45. But there's not a lot of cold weather in Texas

    Last edited by dondavis3; 09-06-2009 at 09:02 PM.

  7. #7
    spongebobmac's Avatar
    spongebobmac is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    50
    sig gets my vote since the xd sc wasnt an option

  8. #8
    tedtf is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    11
    Ended up buying the M&P 9c today. Gun fit me well and price was right as well.

  9. #9
    spongebobmac's Avatar
    spongebobmac is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    50
    well heck that want even an option , but a great choice none the less, congrats,

  10. #10
    Bisley's Avatar
    Bisley is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    1,440
    I can't answer the question you asked, but here is some reasoning that I have arrived at after trying a lot of different handguns and several modes of carry, that you might want to consider.

    Both of the single-stacks you mention are excellent carry guns, but neither are pocket guns. That means that for best concealment, you are most likely going to end up carrying IWB or OWB. Depending on your build, and a few other individual factors, you may notice a significant difference in width, between a double-stack and a single-stack. Personally, I can't really feel very much difference. They are lighter, because they have less ammo, but that's not a very big deal with a good carry setup.

    I now realize that, in nearly any situation in which I can wear a cover garment, I can carry a double-stack compact, just as easily. In fact, I often carry my full sized CZ-75B, or a 1911 clone, in a very comfortable home-made holster of my own design that allows me to tilt the grip into a vertical orientation, or an XD45 with a Clip-Draw that I can wear very comfortably, sitting, standing, or driving.

    I'm just saying that you may not need to restrict yourself to a single-stack. I have a Kahr K-9 that is the same size as the Walther PPS, and although it is a quality handgun, I rarely carry it, because in any instance where I am able to conceal it, I can just as easily conceal a .45, which is my preferred self-defense weapon, or at least a double-stack 9mm.

    EDIT: I missed the post where you mentioned you had already bought the M&P - good choice.
    Last edited by Bisley; 09-15-2009 at 08:06 AM. Reason: I overlooked your last post.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

ppk vs p239
,
pps ccw
,

pps vs p239

,
sig p239 vs ppk
,
sig p239 vs pps
,
sig p239 vs walther ppk
,

sig p239 vs walther pps

,
walther ppk vs sig 239
,

walther ppk vs sig p239

,

walther pps vs ppk

,
walther pps vs sig 239
,

walther pps vs sig p239

Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1