Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    870ShellShucker's Avatar
    870ShellShucker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    91

    Ruger Police Service Six and S&W Model 10

    I have a 4" Ruger Police Service Six, and I compared it to a picture of a 4" S&W Model 10 with Bull Barrel. It looks like the only big differences are the longer cylinder for the .357 chamber, and the ejector shroud. The two guns are very similar. They look like brothers or something. I'm surprised that S&W didn't accuse Ruger of outright copying their design. A very successful design too.

  2. #2
    VAMarine's Avatar
    VAMarine is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by 870ShellShucker View Post
    I have a 4" Ruger Police Service Six, and I compared it to a picture of a 4" S&W Model 10 with Bull Barrel. It looks like the only big differences are the longer cylinder for the .357 chamber, and the ejector shroud. The two guns are very similar. They look like brothers or something. I'm surprised that S&W didn't accuse Ruger of outright copying their design. A very successful design too.
    There's a pretty good amount of difference in the designs. Cylinder release, frame style, how to access the trigger group to name a few.

  3. #3
    DJ Niner's Avatar
    DJ Niner is offline HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    North-Central USA
    Posts
    4,462
    Externally, they may appear similar, but internally, their parts are VERY different. For instance, the Ruger uses stainless-steel coil springs throughout the mechanism, where the S&W uses a mixture of coil and carbon-steel flat springs. The Ruger can also be field-stripped without tools, just like most autoloading pistols; try doing THAT with a S&W revolver! Probably the most obvious external difference is the cylinder release button, which slides forward/rearward on the S&W, and presses into the frame to release the cylinder on the Ruger, but you can only see that from the left side view of each handgun.

    The intended use for this type of handgun drove the basic features (during the revolver's golden age, most police/security forces wanted a 4" heavy barrel, .38/.357 caliber, and a reasonable grip size), but how each manufacturer got to the final product was up to them.
    "Placement is power" -- seen in an article by Stephen A. Camp
    (RIP, Mr. Camp; you will be remembered, and missed)

  4. #4
    DJ Niner's Avatar
    DJ Niner is offline HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    North-Central USA
    Posts
    4,462
    Dang it, too slow. I have to practice typing faster, and not getting distracted by other things while typing a response!
    "Placement is power" -- seen in an article by Stephen A. Camp
    (RIP, Mr. Camp; you will be remembered, and missed)

  5. #5
    VAMarine's Avatar
    VAMarine is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Niner View Post
    Dang it, too slow. I have to practice typing faster, and not getting distracted by other things while typing a response!


    You did however include more detail regarding the springs.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

police service six ruger
,

ruger police service six

,
ruger police service six concealed carry
,
ruger police service six forum
,
ruger police service six parts
,
ruger police service six, heavy barrel
,
ruger security six vs smith and wesson model 10
,

ruger service six

,
ruger service six vs smith and wesson model 10
,

s&w model 10 vs ruger service six

,
security six vs model 10
,
smith and wesson serket service six revolver
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1