Here we go. Again.

    Results 1 to 7 of 7
    1. #1
      Member TheReaper's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Alabama
      Posts
      370

      Here we go. Again.


    2. #2
      Senior Member Steve M1911A1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northwest Washington State
      Posts
      7,536
      No logical or reasonable comment on this matter will do any good at all.
      Bloomberg's stated position is, "I've already made up my mind, so don't try to confuse me with facts."

      How can any set of laws and regulations that affect the law-abiding have any effect upon a criminal?
      Martinez was in illegal possession of a gun. He was already a criminal, by definition, because he hadn't taken out the required peddler's license. Possessing the gun was merely another criminal act. Further, he probably was in illegal possession the gun in order to illegally sell it to somebody else.
      How can making more or stronger laws against gun possession have any effect on people like Martinez?
      Bloomberg can't answer that one, so he merely avoids the issue and makes more anti-gun edicts. To the fools who vote for him, it appears that he's "doing something" about the problem.

      But then, laws don't mean a whole lot to Bloomberg anyway. He's serving his third term as Mayor in a city where, until very recently, the law limited the Mayor to two terms. How come? Because Bloomberg changed the law to suit himself.

    3. #3
      Senior Member niadhf's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Rural New York
      Posts
      1,197
      and in typical usa today fashion, they (purposely i must assume) misreport the weapon used, and wait until half way through the second paragraph to point out that the one shot and killed (the "victim" in their parlance" was the offender. The firearm was not an automatic mac-10, but a knock off, semi- auto, that even the NYPOST got right (dont ask me how).
      So.. anyone read news bias?
      Anyone surprised.
      And Steve, don't bother king michael with logic, he is planning his run for the guvonator.

    4. #4
      Senior Member
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Kentucky
      Posts
      3,373
      Quote Originally Posted by niadhf View Post
      and in typical usa today fashion, they (purposely i must assume) misreport the weapon used, and wait until half way through the second paragraph to point out that the one shot and killed (the "victim" in their parlance" was the offender. The firearm was not an automatic mac-10, but a knock off, semi- auto, that even the NYPOST got right (dont ask me how).
      So.. anyone read news bias?
      Anyone surprised.
      And Steve, don't bother king michael with logic, he is planning his run for the guvonator.
      Yeah..I likes how they used the term Machine pistol

    5. #5
      Member TheReaper's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Alabama
      Posts
      370
      Quote Originally Posted by DevilsJohnson View Post
      Yeah..I likes how they used the term Machine pistol
      A two shot and jam machine pistol.

    6. #6
      Senior Member
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Kentucky
      Posts
      3,373
      Heh..I had a MAC 11 some years back when I was young and cool It didn't like HP ammo but was OK with FMJ.

    7. #7
      Senior Member niadhf's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Rural New York
      Posts
      1,197
      Quote Originally Posted by TheReaper View Post
      A two shot and jam machine pistol.
      Yeah, thats the kind i want the bad guys to have, especially with a spray and pray mentality. less likely to actually hit someone. I'll stick to a semi-auto i practice with and that works lol.

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •