If this is fact, I don't know what else could be required to impeach the idiot/traitor.
Obama To Sell B-2 Bomber Blueprints To China To Pay Off Debt
The Defense Department is reportedly furious with Obama's http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2...prints-to.html proposal to sell blueprints of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to the People's Republic. Gates has flatly rejected Obama's plan, but has since been asked to step down if he will not facilitate the process.
According to the deal, the United States would sell the plans for the B-2, along with radar-absorbing paints and metals in exchange for $50 billion in debt relief. The B-2 cost the US government $23 billion to develop the bomber in the 1980s.
According to the Administration, this proposal will help the United States resolve its debt issues. They point out their belief that the B-2 bomber is "strategically obsolete", according to a source in the White House Press Office. In addition, the source claims that the Chinese would be unable to create their own functioning stealth bomber fleet for "at least eight years."
American allies Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea are very wary of the proposal. Koo Syi, a geopolitical analyst from South Korea, points out that this technology could be passed to China's allies. This was the case when Chinese nuclear technology was transferred to Pakistan and North Korea. According to Koo, Obama has rendered US allies' opinions as "irrelevant."
While this proposal is controversial, it is not being presented to Congress, where it could meet with stern opposition. Instead, the State Department has been informed to assist the Defense Department with the transfer of materials.
Yep, not true
I have a question for the believers in Snopes.
What vetting process did you follow to arrive at the conclusion Snopes is never wrong and always tells the whole truth?
I don't believe a lot of what I see and hear be it on the TV, Radio, Internet or in person.
I have heard many "experts" in government, the media, academia, medicine etc. make many claims only to have those claims strongly disputed over time and in many cases proven to my satisfaction to be false and some times constitute criminal conduct.
I find it hard to believe Snopes is any different than other purveyors of information scattered through our civilization.
Some info I choose to pass on will as in this posting include a question mark or if statement as I don't have absolute knowledge. I don't believe Snopes does either.
The jumpinginpools blog is nothing but satire...
Q: How do I know the information you've presented is accurate?
A: We don't expect anyone to accept us as the ultimate authority on any topic. Unlike the plethora of anonymous individuals who create and send the unsigned, unsourced e-mail messages that are forwarded all over the Internet, we show our work. The research materials we've used in the preparation of any particular page are listed in the bibliography displayed at the bottom of that page so that readers who wish to verify the validity of our information may check those sources for themselves.
Does this mean I can't be outraged?
Snopes is pretty good about getting to the bottom of things. If it was true though I think it would be safe to say HObama would need to start wearing Kevlar panties