Iraq's oil-fueled surplus could hit $80 billion
You've got to be kidding me! They're sitting on a pile of cash and we're paying to rebuild their country?!? We truly are the welfare system of the world!
Iraq's oil-fueled surplus could hit $80 billion, report says
Iraq is raking in more money from oil exports than it is spending, amassing a projected four-year budget surplus of up to $80 billion, U.S. auditors reported Tuesday.
Leading members of Congress, noting that Washington is paying for reconstruction in Iraq, expressed outrage at the assessment. One called the findings "inexcusable."
"We should not be paying for Iraqi projects while Iraqi oil revenues continue to pile up in the bank, including outrageous profits from $4-a-gallon gas prices in the U.S.," said Sen. Carl Levin, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "We should require that U.S. taxpayers be reimbursed for the cost of large projects."
Baghdad had a $29 billion budget surplus between 2005 to 2007. With the price of crude roughly doubling in the past year, Iraq's surplus for 2008 is expected to run between $38 billion and $50 billion, according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
The United States has put about $48 billion toward reconstruction since the 2003 invasion of Iraq auditors reported. About $23 billion of that was spent on the oil and electricity industries, water systems and security.
Iraq spent $3.9 billion on those sectors from 2005 through April 2008, according to the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress. The ongoing fighting there, a shortage of trained staff and weak controls have made it difficult for the Iraqi government to spend its surplus on needed projects, the agency's report concluded.
Levin, a Michigan Democrat, has been an outspoken critic of the slow progress of reconstruction and an advocate of a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. His criticism Tuesday was echoed by Sen. John Warner, a Virginia Republican who is the former chairman and now a leading member of Levin's committee.
"Despite Iraq earning billions of dollars in oil revenue in the past five years, U.S. taxpayer money has been the overwhelming source of Iraq reconstruction funds," Warner said in a joint statement with Levin. "It is time for the sovereign government of Iraq, using its revenues, expenditures and surpluses, to fully assume the responsibility to provide essential services and improve the quality of life for the Iraqi people."
In its written response to the audit report, the Treasury Department said U.S. officials are working with Iraqis to address the issue, "and we believe progress is being made."
"The report shows Iraq's budget surplus is likely to grow significantly over the course of 2008, but it is equally important to realize that spending in Iraq is also increasing," Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Andy Baukol wrote to the GAO.
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government submitted a $22 billion supplemental budget to the Iraqi parliament in July, including $8 billion in proposed capital expenditures, Baukol wrote.
The issue raised the hackles of several members of Congress earlier this year -- particularly because Bush administration officials said on the eve of the war that Iraqi oil money would pay for reconstruction.
In 2003, then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz told the House Appropriations Committee: "We're dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon.''
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-California, said Tuesday's report "is going to make a lot of American families very angry."
"The record gas prices they are paying have turned into an economic windfall for Iraq, but the Iraqi government isn't spending the money on rebuilding," said Waxman, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Levin spokeswoman Tara Andringa said the senator hopes to tighten rules governing U.S. expenditures on Iraqi reconstruction efforts in the next Pentagon authorization bill.
The Iraqi surplus has piled up even though the country's oil production has only recently matched prewar levels, according to the Brookings Institution's latest Iraq Index.
The country spent about 80 percent of its $29 billion operating budget in 2007, including public services and salaries, but only 28 percent of its $12 billion investment budget, the GAO found.
The export of crude oil accounted for 94 percent of Iraq's revenues from 2005 to 2007, the GAO reported.
Iraq has been a Halliburton (Cheney) marketing exercise.
Get over it.
Care to elaborate on who and why?
Originally Posted by submoa
Iraq rebuild spending has nothing to do with welfare aid to parts of the world that hates the US. Its all about the Benjamins. Articles that stimulate outrage at how ungrateful these foreigners are to the billions we spend to 'help' them, divert attention away from who actually gets the money.
Dick Cheney's personal wealth is heavily invested in Halliburton.
If a KBR truck driver (KBR is a Halliburton subsidiary) can make $125,000 in Iraq, how much was the US govt charged for his services? Now ask yourself why is an American needed to drive a truck when someone local can do it cheaper? Profit margin.
It makes more sense to use local labor. Employing Iraqis does more to help the Iraq recovery than having them stand around and watch foreigners do the work. No one in the US cares if Iraqi insurgents blow up other Iraqis.
Now 80 Billion in oil profits in Iraq's treasury. Next we will hear about how that figure was overstated or how so many billions have gone "missing." Don't kid yourself... much of this money will end up in someone's pocket.
So don't be angry at the ungrateful foreigners, focus on the guy who's writing the check to stuff his own wallet.