Who is more usefull?

    View Poll Results: Who is the more usefull person?

    Voters
    6. You may not vote on this poll
    • 100% storage ,10% application

      1 16.67%
    • 10% storage ,100% application

      5 83.33%
    Results 1 to 14 of 14
    1. #1
      Member hawcer's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Posts
      178

      Question Who is more usefull?

      Who is more usefull...a person that can use 100% of their brain but can only apply 10% of it... Or a person that can only use 10% of their brain,but can apply 100% of it?

    2. #2
      Junior Member Root's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northern, NJ
      Posts
      24
      Quote Originally Posted by hawcer View Post
      Who is more usefull...a person that can use 100% of their brain but can only apply 10% of it... Or a person that can only use 10% of their brain,but can apply 100% of it?
      Let me throw it back at you
      Would you rather be a jack of all trades, and a master of none?
      OR be an expert at one? (something tells me in the real world, this should yield more $)
      Bri

    3. #3
      Member hawcer's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Posts
      178
      Quote Originally Posted by Root View Post
      Let me throw it back at you
      Would you rather be a jack of all trades, and a master of none?
      OR be an expert at one? (something tells me in the real world, this should yield more $)
      Bri
      You are correct in thinking someone that is an expert in one field should make more $ .....it's too bad they are the ones getting the shaft and being replaced by younger, less expirienced workers so the companies can save a buck.

      ...Which pushes us into the jack-of-whatever job you can get field.

      But,I would say I am a Jack-of-all-trades by nature...I would get extremely bored if i could only do one thing.

    4. #4
      Member Snowman's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      North Carolina
      Posts
      369
      Realize that the two are mathematically equivalent. Each can use 10% of the whole.

    5. #5
      TOF
      TOF is offline
      Senior Member TOF's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Northern Arizona
      Posts
      3,015
      I would think what was stored and used might cause one to discount value accordingly.

      100% of nothing remains nothing.


    6. #6
      Junior Member Root's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northern, NJ
      Posts
      24
      Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
      Realize that the two are mathematically equivalent. Each can use 10% of the whole.
      Not really, think of it like a computer.
      100 gig hard drive with a pentium 1 processor
      or
      10 gig hard drive with some kind of really fast chip (I don't know much about computers- guess I should have come up with a better analogy)
      Bri

    7. #7
      Member hawcer's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Posts
      178
      The wheels are a turnin'....

      Lets put it another way.

      Light bulb "A" consumes 100 units of energy and produces 10% of that energy into light. 100x10%= 10 units of light

      Light bulb "B" consumes 10 units of energy and produces 100% of that energy into light. 10x100%= 10 units of light

      But,one could argue...

      Farmer "A" has 100 sheep but will only show his best 10%
      Farmer "B" only has 10 sheep and will show 100% of his sheep.

      So I ask again...which is more usefull?










      BTW...I'm trying my hardest to keep from losing my 10%

      This is not a trick question....it is really a "point of view" sort of thing. I just find It fun to jump start the brain every so often.

    8. #8
      Member RightTurnClyde's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      CA
      Posts
      368
      I've heard it said many times that the average person only uses about 10% of their brains ability to begin with, so I think if someone could run that 10% to max capacity, they'd be a pretty sharp cookie.

    9. #9
      Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Posts
      214
      Quote Originally Posted by RightTurnClyde View Post
      I've heard it said many times that the average person only uses about 10% of their brains ability to begin with, so I think if someone could run that 10% to max capacity, they'd be a pretty sharp cookie.
      A common myth, and an oversimplification. The entire brain is not a databank, nor a processor. The cerebellum is the primitive brain that controls basic body functions; most of the unconscious stuff. The cerebrum is largely taken up with the storage of sense data. Every millisecond thousands of images, sounds and sensations are received and processed by your brain. There is only a rudimentary logic to this storage; certain areas deal with different sense memories, but other than that, your brain severs the weakest neural pathways it can find and reconnects it to store the new data. This leads to common writing and rewriting of the same neurons; short-term memory. Pathways on the other hand that are reinforced and strengthened through common use become part of your long-term memory.

      At any given time, neurons are firing willy-nilly to store and overwrite this sense data. However, only a small part of the firmly-established pathways are being used; that is, they are sending/receiving traffic. This is pretty logical; how much of your computer's hard drive is precious memories and important financial data files you rarely look at, versus the cache folder that Internet Explorer uses to store junk you only ever look at once? On a more general level, even given the most powerful computer, how much of your hard drive are you ever accessing at one time?

      If the part of the computer responsible for IDE and SATA (the front-side bus) were flooded with data from the hard drive, it would have no capacity left for RAM, CPU and graphics data transfer, and those components would also be flooded and have no capacity for working with the data. The brain doesn't work the same way, but the concept is similar; if 100% of your brain's neurons were firing, the major nerve trunks would be saturated with chemical signals, and would be unable to retransmit all of them. What would come through would be a garbled heap. In addition, uncontrolled firing of neurons triggers the firing of other neurons out-of-sequence, like a computer trying to open an executable file and start executing instructions beginning halfway through the file. This causes seizures. More general and chronic failures by the brain to create and follow neural pathways create diseases like autism.

      Quite simply, our brain does not and cannot efficiently work at 100%.

    10. #10
      Member hawcer's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Posts
      178
      Liko81 wins!!!

    11. #11
      Banned
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      0
      Quote Originally Posted by Liko81 View Post
      A common myth, and an oversimplification. The entire brain is not a databank, nor a processor. The cerebellum is the primitive brain that controls basic body functions; most of the unconscious stuff. The cerebrum is largely taken up with the storage of sense data. Every millisecond thousands of images, sounds and sensations are received and processed by your brain. There is only a rudimentary logic to this storage; certain areas deal with different sense memories, but other than that, your brain severs the weakest neural pathways it can find and reconnects it to store the new data. This leads to common writing and rewriting of the same neurons; short-term memory. Pathways on the other hand that are reinforced and strengthened through common use become part of your long-term memory.

      At any given time, neurons are firing willy-nilly to store and overwrite this sense data. However, only a small part of the firmly-established pathways are being used; that is, they are sending/receiving traffic. This is pretty logical; how much of your computer's hard drive is precious memories and important financial data files you rarely look at, versus the cache folder that Internet Explorer uses to store junk you only ever look at once? On a more general level, even given the most powerful computer, how much of your hard drive are you ever accessing at one time?

      If the part of the computer responsible for IDE and SATA (the front-side bus) were flooded with data from the hard drive, it would have no capacity left for RAM, CPU and graphics data transfer, and those components would also be flooded and have no capacity for working with the data. The brain doesn't work the same way, but the concept is similar; if 100% of your brain's neurons were firing, the major nerve trunks would be saturated with chemical signals, and would be unable to retransmit all of them. What would come through would be a garbled heap. In addition, uncontrolled firing of neurons triggers the firing of other neurons out-of-sequence, like a computer trying to open an executable file and start executing instructions beginning halfway through the file. This causes seizures. More general and chronic failures by the brain to create and follow neural pathways create diseases like autism.

      Quite simply, our brain does not and cannot efficiently work at 100%.
      My brain hurts after reading that.

    12. #12
      Senior Member niadhf's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Rural New York
      Posts
      1,197
      Quote Originally Posted by Root View Post
      Let me throw it back at you
      Would you rather be a jack of all trades, and a master of none?
      OR be an expert at one? (something tells me in the real world, this should yield more $)
      Bri
      daffynition of an expert - One who knows more and more about less and less until he/she knows aboslutely everything about absolutely nothing.


      Liko81
      What he said.(i'm so confused)

    13. #13
      Member
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Posts
      303
      Quote Originally Posted by Liko81 View Post
      A common myth, and an oversimplification. The entire brain is not a databank, nor a processor. The cerebellum is the primitive brain that controls basic body functions; most of the unconscious stuff. The cerebrum is largely taken up with the storage of sense data. Every millisecond thousands of images, sounds and sensations are received and processed by your brain. There is only a rudimentary logic to this storage; certain areas deal with different sense memories, but other than that, your brain severs the weakest neural pathways it can find and reconnects it to store the new data. This leads to common writing and rewriting of the same neurons; short-term memory. Pathways on the other hand that are reinforced and strengthened through common use become part of your long-term memory.

      At any given time, neurons are firing willy-nilly to store and overwrite this sense data. However, only a small part of the firmly-established pathways are being used; that is, they are sending/receiving traffic. This is pretty logical; how much of your computer's hard drive is precious memories and important financial data files you rarely look at, versus the cache folder that Internet Explorer uses to store junk you only ever look at once? On a more general level, even given the most powerful computer, how much of your hard drive are you ever accessing at one time?

      If the part of the computer responsible for IDE and SATA (the front-side bus) were flooded with data from the hard drive, it would have no capacity left for RAM, CPU and graphics data transfer, and those components would also be flooded and have no capacity for working with the data. The brain doesn't work the same way, but the concept is similar; if 100% of your brain's neurons were firing, the major nerve trunks would be saturated with chemical signals, and would be unable to retransmit all of them. What would come through would be a garbled heap. In addition, uncontrolled firing of neurons triggers the firing of other neurons out-of-sequence, like a computer trying to open an executable file and start executing instructions beginning halfway through the file. This causes seizures. More general and chronic failures by the brain to create and follow neural pathways create diseases like autism.

      Quite simply, our brain does not and cannot efficiently work at 100%.
      Nice response.....you beat me to it

    14. #14
      MLB
      MLB is offline
      Supporting Member MLB's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Buffalo, NY
      Posts
      971
      I'm not entirely sure if this is pertenent to your question, but your post reminded me of a quote of C. Coolidge that seems in the same vein:

      "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence.
      Talent will not; nothing in the world is more common than unsuccessful men with talent.
      Genius will not; unrewarded genius is a proverb.
      Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts.
      Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."
      ~ Calvin Coolidge
      That being said, I'd rather have a little done well, than lots of poorly thought out works.

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •