Vice President Signs Supreme Court Brief Pushing for End to D.C. Firearms Ban

    Results 1 to 5 of 5
    1. #1
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      US
      Posts
      2,850

      Vice President Signs Supreme Court Brief Pushing for End to D.C. Firearms Ban

      Fox News
      Saturday, February 09, 2008


      WASHINGTON — Vice President Cheney took the unusual step Friday of joining with lawmakers in signing a Supreme Court brief that goes further in support of gun rights than the one submitted by the Bush administration.

      The filings were made in a case that challenges the District of Columbia's ban on handguns. It was scheduled to be argued on March 18.

      Both briefs argue that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns. However, the administration contends that too categorical a ruling could threaten other federal gun restrictions and wants the justices to send the case back to lower courts without deciding whether the handgun ban should fall. Not a good sign.

      Cheney joined more than 300 senators and representatives, led by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, who want the court to rule that Washington's ban is unconstitutional.

      "The vice president believes strongly in Second Amendment rights," Cheney spokeswoman Megan Mitchell said.

      Seventeen Democratic lawmakers and District of Columbia Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton urged the court to uphold the ban.

      Lawyers with long experience at the court could not recall another case in which a vice president took a position different from that of his own administration.

    2. #2
      TOF
      TOF is offline
      Senior Member TOF's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Northern Arizona
      Posts
      3,015
      It is good to know that 300+ are on our side. We need to vote the others out.


    3. #3
      Member
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Posts
      784
      Crap, the one guy you don't want on an NRA poster is endorsing a good cause.

      Shooting your buddy in the face when hunting grouse is negligent discharge.

      Getting your buddy to publicly call you the victim after shooting him is just being an a--hole.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11409731/

    4. #4
      Senior Member tony pasley's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Location
      clyde n.c.
      Posts
      2,822
      We need more to stand up and be counted. We can't trust the Courts member to do what is right just because it is the right thing to do.

    5. #5
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      US
      Posts
      2,850
      Quote Originally Posted by tony pasley View Post
      We need more to stand up and be counted. We can't trust the Courts member to do what is right just because it is the right thing to do.
      How true!

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •