Also,
Regarding the whole "Mossad, Israeli Military" issue.
I don't know if a lot of people using this as justification for a product are prior Military or not, but having been prior service allow me to make an observation.
Military issue does not equal or mean it's a superior product.
Does anyone have a source for some of this info
other than Fobus? I'll even take a poorly photchopped picture of a member of the Israeli military using a Fobus holster.
A search of the
Israel Military Forum for the word "Fobus" only brings back two threads, they have about half our number of members. A search for Fobus here brings back 126 threads. Are you telling me that we discuss Fobus holsters more than the people that are supposed to be carrying them????
If you haven't seen it, this might be a good time to check out my thread on
Truth in Advertising
All I see is "Combat proven by the Israeli Military" well guess what, the Beretta M9 is combat proven, but that's doesn't mean I'm going to carry one. The Bianchi nylon flap holster is "combat proven" but I'm not going to buy one. The M4 is "Combat proven" but plenty of people think it needs to be replaced for a piston driven design.
If you want a Fobus, if you like your Fobus, that's fine, but don't rely on buzz words and tag lines to try and make it better than what it is....Suicuide bombers are combat proven, doesn't mean it's a good idea to sign up for that section. Some people even use the "Combat proven" as a defense, but then also admit that "it makes a good range holster, but I wouldn't use it for carry" HOW does that make any sense?
I had one, I gave it a fair shake, it let me down and could have gotten me in some deep doo-doo. I was attraceted to the low cost, but I stopped using it within about 36 hours of actual use and bought something else immediately following it's failure.