View Poll Results: is the Para LDA system a "real" 1911?

88. You may not vote on this poll
  • yeah

    6 6.82%
  • nay

    54 61.36%
  • kinda

    28 31.82%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34

Thread: True 1911

  1. #21
    jwhisler's Avatar
    jwhisler is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Prairieville, Louisiana
    I don't consider it a "true" 1911 because of it being DA

  2. #22
    DevilsJohnson is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Only some Para's are DA. The biggest thing that keeps them from being a true 1911 is the ramped barrel. I have two SAO paras here.

  3. #23
    Old Padawan's Avatar
    Old Padawan is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Phoenix AZ
    ABSOLUTELY NOT. Neither is a Kimber, Springfield, Taurus.

    It depends on where you draw the line. Many guns are based on the 1911-A1 design. If you want to be anal, the addition of a polished and throated barrel, a beavertail grip safety, a trigger stop, taller three-dot sights a barrel less or more than 5”, a guide rod, dehorning, fitted bushing, extended thumb safety, target barrel, tight frame to slide tolerances, flat mainspring, other than wood grips, ambidextrous thumb safety, extended slide release, rail, internal laser, forged frame vs. cast, supported chamber…the list goes on.

    IMHO a 1911 is any gun based on the frame, slide, operating system of the original 1911. It just depends on where you draw the line. Is the Para GI Expert a 1911? If so is the Tac Four? Is the change in trigger the defining difference that makes a gun no longer a 1911 based design?
    I think we use the “TERM” 1911 to describe any of the many offerings from Colt, Springfield, Kimber, Taurus, Ed Brown, STI, Night Hawk, Sig, Smith and Wesson etc… Very few of them are a “1911”.
    "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." -Mark Twain

  4. #24
    dances with guns's Avatar
    dances with guns is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    i voted nay.

    the main reason the 1911 is so popular to this day, i think, is the short light trigger stroke which allows very fast and accurate shooting.

    the para lda is a fantastic double action trigger pull, i just prefer the single action on my 1911's for the previously stated reason.

  5. #25
    tateb24's Avatar
    tateb24 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Double stacked 45s....not a big fan and never will be one.

  6. #26
    oak1971's Avatar
    oak1971 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    It's an abomination

  7. #27
    the.batman is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    The LDA is NOT a "true" 1911- is has a completely different firing system. I have never owned one and I have heard (but not experienced) that there are long term durability issues with the LDAs due to all the additional small parts. Make no mistake, the LDA firing system has more small parts and a completely different mechanical action than a John Browning design 1911 pistol.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Virginia Beach Va, Savannah GA
    I dont know what this is,so I will go do some research and then come back and vote.

  9. #29
    texgunner's Avatar
    texgunner is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Houston, Texas
    A true M1911 is a single action only trigger. I say "nay."

  10. #30
    Freedom1911's Avatar
    Freedom1911 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Para makes or use to make their 18-9 as a true 1911 mechanically. Many look at a 1911 type pistol and if it is not 45acp it is not a 1911.
    To me as long as it operates by the original 1911 design then it is a true 1911. Caliber matters not.
    The Para LDA is a double action pistol. That makes it a 1911 like pistol in many ways, but a true 1911 is single action. There may be other changes that prevent it from being a true 1911 but the action change is all it takes in my book to take it off the true 1911 list.

    It does still look like one barring the trigger, but it is not one.

  11. #31
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Northwest Washington State
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom1911 View Post
    ...To me as long as it operates by the original 1911 design then it is a true 1911. Caliber matters not...
    I agree.
    Colt's made their Government Model in at least four different calibers: .45 ACP, 9mm, .38 Super, and .22 LR rimfire.
    (The rimfire version used a barrel with a very different chamber, but the rest of the pistol was the same as a standard Government Model.)

  12. #32
    khegglie's Avatar
    khegglie is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    The Nutmeg state
    Quote Originally Posted by texgunner View Post
    A true M1911 is a single action only trigger. I say "nay."
    The Nays have made their points well!!

    I get it.

    I like the LD's keeping most of the manual of arms of the 1911 system , and the non cocked and lock carry ( though that aint really a problem for me... just that options are good)! Thanks for all of the replies...Khegg

  13. #33
    1911/W_HotSauce's Avatar
    1911/W_HotSauce is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    No, but I love mine.

  14. #34
    nightal is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    K.C. MO.
    I voted nay also.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Remove Ads


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search tags for this page

para 45 ltc

para gi ltc operating system

para lda vs. 1911

para ordnance companion ii

para ordnance ctx1345 review
single stack 1911
sti single stack cal 40

tac four


tac four pics

true 1911
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1