External vs. internal extractors

    Results 1 to 15 of 15
    1. #1
      Junior Member Gearheart's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      73

      External vs. internal extractors

      I'm slowly gathering parts to build myself a 1911. Right now I'm looking at slides and barrels. I've looked at both internal and external extractors and neither design seems more reliable or more aesthetically pleasing to me. Does anyone here have an opinion on the subject?

    2. #2
      Senior Member tony pasley's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Location
      clyde n.c.
      Posts
      2,808
      I like internal better myself.

    3. #3
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Posts
      81
      Same here, I prefer the look of the internal extractor. I own one 1911 with an external extractor, its a Kimber ProCarry and I have had no problems with it. Aesthetically the external looks great on the Sigs but I guess that I am too old school on this.

    4. #4
      Senior Member Steve M1911A1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northwest Washington State
      Posts
      7,534
      Internal 1911 Extractor
      Plus:
      It's the original design, and it's an elegant engineering solution.
      Fewer parts to break or go wrong.
      Easy to replace, when it breaks.
      You can get it really clean.
      No external projections to catch the fingers.
      Minus:
      Must be removed to properly clean.
      One more part to remove and replace when cleaning.
      It can break, if its metal gets fatigued.

      External 1911 Extractor
      Plus:
      You don't have to remove it during cleaning.
      It's less likely to break unexpectedly.
      Acts as very effective loaded-chamber indicator.
      Minus:
      Adds materially to the parts-count.
      Probably not user-repairable or -replaceable.
      Can lacerate the hand during slide manipulation.
      Harder to clean.

    5. #5
      Junior Member Gearheart's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Posts
      73
      Internal it is.

      Thank you Steve.

    6. #6
      Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      SEALY, TX.
      Posts
      126
      Listen to what steve1911a1 is telling you----stick with the original browning designed internal extractor whenever possible. Old john moses browning can still be trusted after almost 100 years !!!!!!! Ooooo-rah steve

    7. #7
      Senior Member Steve M1911A1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northwest Washington State
      Posts
      7,534
      Thanks for the boost, Guru.
      But note that this thread is a couple of years old, and wasn't continued once the OP's question had been answered.

    8. #8
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Russellville, Ar
      Posts
      16
      Something else to think about. Internal extractors need to be tuned, external don't. Tuning a 1911 extractor can be tricky and frustrating. In a lot of cases, its not a drop in fit.

    9. #9
      Senior Member Steve M1911A1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northwest Washington State
      Posts
      7,534
      Quote Originally Posted by gpo1956 View Post
      Something else to think about. Internal extractors need to be tuned, external don't. Tuning a 1911 extractor can be tricky and frustrating. In a lot of cases, its not a drop in fit. [emphasis added]
      Um, that's not exactly true.
      External extractors, too, can misbehave, and can have to be filed and polished here and there.
      And then there's the ejector...

    10. #10
      Member HGF Gold Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      501
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
      Internal 1911 Extractor
      Plus:
      It's the original design, and it's an elegant engineering solution.
      Great informed answer!
      Eli

    11. #11
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Russellville, Ar
      Posts
      16
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
      Um, that's not exactly true.
      External extractors, too, can misbehave, and can have to be filed and polished here and there.
      And then there's the ejector...
      Steve,
      If you will read my post, I never said external extractors don't ever have problems. He's asking about building a 1911 from scratch. Nine times out of ten a new internal extractor won't just drop in without tuning. In most cases, the external extractor is more forgiving. Obviously you've never had to tune an internal extractor. It can, indeed, be very very frustrating.

    12. #12
      Senior Member zhurdan's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Location
      Wyoming
      Posts
      1,251
      Quote Originally Posted by gpo1956 View Post
      Steve,
      If you will read my post, I never said external extractors don't ever have problems. He's asking about building a 1911 from scratch. Nine times out of ten a new internal extractor won't just drop in without tuning. In most cases, the external extractor is more forgiving. Obviously you've never had to tune an internal extractor. It can, indeed, be very very frustrating.

      Hahahaa... I think he's probably done a few.

    13. #13
      Senior Member Steve M1911A1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northwest Washington State
      Posts
      7,534
      Truth:
      I am not a gunsmith. I do a little kitchen-table gunsmithing, and the only machine tools I own are a small drill press, a grinder, a polisher, and a Dremel.
      However, while I lived in Southern California, I was close friends with a very talented gunsmith. I started out watching him work, and then I graduated to doing some of my own work under his watchful eye.
      I've never fitted either kind of extractor myself, but I watched him do many, so I know what's involved.

      Once another 'smith brought a 1911 to practice, and he bragged that this gun would drop all of its empties into a bucket that had been placed just so.
      He demonstrated his extractor and ejector fitting to us, and by golly he was telling the truth. Every empty that came out of that pistol went into the bucket!
      Trouble was, the pistol was woefully inaccurate. It wouldn't shoot groups; it shot patterns. But, by golly, every empty case went into that bucket.

    14. #14
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Location
      Russellville, Ar
      Posts
      16
      Quote Originally Posted by zhurdan View Post
      Hahahaa... I think he's probably done a few.
      Hahahaa, I guess he hasn't, has he?

    15. #15
      Senior Member Steve M1911A1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Location
      Northwest Washington State
      Posts
      7,534
      Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
      ...I've never fitted either kind of extractor myself, but I watched him do many, so I know what's involved...
      Um, gpo1956, I believe that the laugh's on you.

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Search tags for this page

    1911 external ejector
    ,
    1911 external extractor vs internal extractor
    ,

    1911 external vs internal extractor

    ,

    1911 internal vs external extractor

    ,

    external extractor vs internal extractor

    ,

    external vs internal extractor

    ,

    external vs internal extractor 1911

    ,

    internal extractor vs external extractor

    ,
    internal versus external extractor
    ,

    internal vs external extractor

    ,

    internal vs external extractor 1911

    ,

    internal vs external extractors

    Click on a term to search for related topics.