Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Gearheart's Avatar
    Gearheart is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    73

    External vs. internal extractors

    I'm slowly gathering parts to build myself a 1911. Right now I'm looking at slides and barrels. I've looked at both internal and external extractors and neither design seems more reliable or more aesthetically pleasing to me. Does anyone here have an opinion on the subject?

  2. #2
    tony pasley's Avatar
    tony pasley is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    clyde n.c.
    Posts
    2,210
    I like internal better myself.

  3. #3
    Slowfire is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    81
    Same here, I prefer the look of the internal extractor. I own one 1911 with an external extractor, its a Kimber ProCarry and I have had no problems with it. Aesthetically the external looks great on the Sigs but I guess that I am too old school on this.

  4. #4
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,563
    Internal 1911 Extractor
    Plus:
    It's the original design, and it's an elegant engineering solution.
    Fewer parts to break or go wrong.
    Easy to replace, when it breaks.
    You can get it really clean.
    No external projections to catch the fingers.
    Minus:
    Must be removed to properly clean.
    One more part to remove and replace when cleaning.
    It can break, if its metal gets fatigued.

    External 1911 Extractor
    Plus:
    You don't have to remove it during cleaning.
    It's less likely to break unexpectedly.
    Acts as very effective loaded-chamber indicator.
    Minus:
    Adds materially to the parts-count.
    Probably not user-repairable or -replaceable.
    Can lacerate the hand during slide manipulation.
    Harder to clean.

  5. #5
    Gearheart's Avatar
    Gearheart is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    73
    Internal it is.

    Thank you Steve.

  6. #6
    GURU1911 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SEALY, TX.
    Posts
    126
    Listen to what steve1911a1 is telling you----stick with the original browning designed internal extractor whenever possible. Old john moses browning can still be trusted after almost 100 years !!!!!!! Ooooo-rah steve

  7. #7
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,563
    Thanks for the boost, Guru.
    But note that this thread is a couple of years old, and wasn't continued once the OP's question had been answered.

  8. #8
    gpo1956 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Russellville, Ar
    Posts
    16
    Something else to think about. Internal extractors need to be tuned, external don't. Tuning a 1911 extractor can be tricky and frustrating. In a lot of cases, its not a drop in fit.

  9. #9
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,563
    Quote Originally Posted by gpo1956 View Post
    Something else to think about. Internal extractors need to be tuned, external don't. Tuning a 1911 extractor can be tricky and frustrating. In a lot of cases, its not a drop in fit. [emphasis added]
    Um, that's not exactly true.
    External extractors, too, can misbehave, and can have to be filed and polished here and there.
    And then there's the ejector...

  10. #10
    EliWolfe is offline Member HGF Gold Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    501
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
    Internal 1911 Extractor
    Plus:
    It's the original design, and it's an elegant engineering solution.
    Great informed answer!
    Eli

  11. #11
    gpo1956 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Russellville, Ar
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
    Um, that's not exactly true.
    External extractors, too, can misbehave, and can have to be filed and polished here and there.
    And then there's the ejector...
    Steve,
    If you will read my post, I never said external extractors don't ever have problems. He's asking about building a 1911 from scratch. Nine times out of ten a new internal extractor won't just drop in without tuning. In most cases, the external extractor is more forgiving. Obviously you've never had to tune an internal extractor. It can, indeed, be very very frustrating.

  12. #12
    zhurdan's Avatar
    zhurdan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by gpo1956 View Post
    Steve,
    If you will read my post, I never said external extractors don't ever have problems. He's asking about building a 1911 from scratch. Nine times out of ten a new internal extractor won't just drop in without tuning. In most cases, the external extractor is more forgiving. Obviously you've never had to tune an internal extractor. It can, indeed, be very very frustrating.

    Hahahaa... I think he's probably done a few.

  13. #13
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,563
    Truth:
    I am not a gunsmith. I do a little kitchen-table gunsmithing, and the only machine tools I own are a small drill press, a grinder, a polisher, and a Dremel.
    However, while I lived in Southern California, I was close friends with a very talented gunsmith. I started out watching him work, and then I graduated to doing some of my own work under his watchful eye.
    I've never fitted either kind of extractor myself, but I watched him do many, so I know what's involved.

    Once another 'smith brought a 1911 to practice, and he bragged that this gun would drop all of its empties into a bucket that had been placed just so.
    He demonstrated his extractor and ejector fitting to us, and by golly he was telling the truth. Every empty that came out of that pistol went into the bucket!
    Trouble was, the pistol was woefully inaccurate. It wouldn't shoot groups; it shot patterns. But, by golly, every empty case went into that bucket.

  14. #14
    gpo1956 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Russellville, Ar
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by zhurdan View Post
    Hahahaa... I think he's probably done a few.
    Hahahaa, I guess he hasn't, has he?

  15. #15
    Steve M1911A1's Avatar
    Steve M1911A1 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    5,563
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M1911A1 View Post
    ...I've never fitted either kind of extractor myself, but I watched him do many, so I know what's involved...
    Um, gpo1956, I believe that the laugh's on you.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

1911 external ejector
,
1911 external extractor vs internal extractor
,

1911 external vs internal extractor

,

1911 internal vs external extractor

,

external extractor vs internal extractor

,

external vs internal extractor

,

external vs internal extractor 1911

,

internal extractor vs external extractor

,
internal versus external extractor
,

internal vs external extractor

,

internal vs external extractor 1911

,

internal vs external extractors

Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Springfield Armory

» HGF Sponsors

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1