usmcj, although I criticized your post in the other thread, I have a similar understanding of private property rights. Private property owners have the right to control firearms on their property, including businesses. Although not legally barred from doing so, I consider it disrespectful of others to attempt to regulate certain rights...continuing off your example, it may be legal for you to ban Jews from your home, as freedom of religion does not apply to your property, but I will avoid dealing with you in any way as a result.
Following from that, the other thread was for informing others whether a business has stated anti-gun polices, or has asked those carrying to leave, in case we wish to avoid dealing with such businesses. However, your post in the other thread was offtopic, and highly critical of Benny's method of carry. You clearly feel strongly against open carry, which is fine; there are reasonable arguments that it's counterproductive. But Benny's post, as I said in that thread, was informational, and many of us here do not wish to patronize businesses that oppose open carry, as well as those opposing CCW.
You asked over there:
Considering the owner was not aware you were carrying, the answer is probably "anti-gun". Of business owners who choose not to post signs, most probably didn't even think to do so...the idea that a business owner would have the conscious thought "I'm not going to post, since concealed is ok, but I don't want anyone openly carrying a gun" is a stretch in most cases other than a gun store. Occam's Razor applies.
Originally Posted by usmcj
I am not, but someone who sees a properly holstered, openly carried firearm and thinks "gangbanger" is likely anti-gun in the first place.
Originally Posted by usmcj
In short, your post in that thread didn't contribute, and was looking to pick a fight against open-carry as detrimental to gun rights. In my opinion, you're kicking up unnecessary fuss. Very few people here actually want to ride roughshod over others' rights, but there are a fair number who would like businesses to respect their decision to carry, whether it's open or concealed.
KG... point taken. That being said, I know several business owners who have no objection to guns, or carrying guns, but have seen other patrons leave when openly carried guns have appeared in their establishments, resulting in anti open carry, which has evolved into anti gun signs.
I don't care who open carries, or for what reason. What seems wrong to me is to vehemently promote one's own rights, and then cry foul when someone else's rights come into play. I've carried a handgun for over 40 years, without being asked to leave any establishment. Most of the time I carry concealed.
Should I decide one day to carry openly and get asked to leave private property, I don't see as I'd have a complaint coming. Accountability, and taking responsibility for one's actions plays in sooner or later. I didn't and still don't see any of either in this instance.
We get so tied up in the Bill of Rights that we forget that these 10 amendments were just that, amendments. They were additions after the Constitution was written. The Constitution of the U.S. was written primarily about property rights, not individual rights. The Revolutionary War was over property rights not individual rights. Delve into the writings of the founding fathers and you will see that their primary concern was in being able to conduct business without interference from the Crown. Thomas Jefferson was the only true "enlightened" member of this elite group. If he had not really pushed the point, there wouldn't even be a Bill of Rights. (The BofR was not popular with the majority of the founding fathers,)
As our laws were written in the beginning to protect property rights, so will they continue in that vein. As much as it hurts, a reality check will show that this country was not formed by a "peoples' revolution over individual rights violations but by was instigated by a group of wealthy businessmen in response to an overbearing and meddling Central Government. I don't agree with everything the Tea Party says, but this part they have right. Before we start with the "Liberty" calls, reflect on history. Liberty and freedom of individuals has only occurred in those nations that have enforced strong property rights. This is one of the biggest reasons that socialism fails.
While I agree somewhat with what has been said by the OP there is the option to us to sway the business owner. I have seen businesses change their practices because their customers have "boycotted" them to show their protest. While it is the business's choice to do business the way they want it is also our choice on if we want to give them our business. So there is no reason to put someone down for their choice to put a thread up showing their dissatisfaction over the fact of being kicked out of a business because of our choice of wearing a gun or not. And while there may seem to not be a lot of us who will boycott an establishment you might be surprised at how many there actually are. Just ask Amazon about the boycott over the pedaphile book that they tried to sell.
I apologize if this was said already i did not read all the posts.
There is an issue of the property owner being liable of an accident involving that open carry handgun. Store owner knowingly allowing that person or persons to carry on their property may have significant liability issues.
I could be wrong elsewhere, but I do know in WI, that you are not liable for someone's gun because you allow it in your property. However, that may apply to just private land, not businesses. As I don't own a business, I haven't looked into it. Original Poster; I'm going to agree with your nemesis on here. He is free to post this thread, just as you are to complain about it. However, using terms like "butthurt" instead of frustrated is going to NEVER get you anywhere in an argument, especially if you are speaking to a non-gunner about gun rights. Also: the term Nazi is used to describe someone who is part of the National Socialist Party, not someone who disagrees with your views, because generally as a rule, someone disagreeing would mean that they believe in free speech, not something granted by your German Socialist pals.
It wasn't Thomas Jefferson who pushed for a Bill of Rights. It was George Mason and Patrick Henry. They badgered James Madison who initially saw no need for one, until they convinced him of a real need.
Originally Posted by wjh2657
And the Bill of Rights does not grant or issue rights to the individual. It recognizes rights which exist by virtue of an individual's birth.
As for property, keep in mind that everyone's original property is their own self.
They also have liability issues when someone is injured or killed by a BG in their place of business.
Originally Posted by pic
If said business does NOT have a sign posted, they are not liable.........if said business DOES have a sign posted, then they are in effect guaranteeing it's customers, that it is a gun free zone....then if a shooting occurs, they are liable.
Originally Posted by CMaki
Two words----INSURANCE COMPANIES. Think of the liability and money involved if someone is accidently shot in a business. Insurance companies set the rules in many aspects of our lives these days. The company I work for (apt. owner/ management company) allows pets in one of the apt. complexes I manage but not the other. In the one that does allow it, an additional non-refundable deposit is required and the size limit is set at 17 lbs. Why at 17 lbs? The insurance companies charge an abhorrent more money on our liability coverage for anything over the 17 lb. weight limit. The rates they set and charge, controls many aspects in our daily lives.
Depends on the state you are in.
Originally Posted by berettabone
That works both ways. Many states provide immunity to the business owner when he allows a properly authorized person to carry his gun in the place of business. Disallowing the person to have protection could create a liability situation in itself.
Originally Posted by pic
It's not the "law" persay, but it's what will happen when attorneys get involved
Originally Posted by sleepy
Some of the open carry laws do allow the police to check your credentials if they choose to , depending on the state or town you are in.
I think Wisconsin might be one of the states, not exactly sure on that.
If I were a business owner I might have to do the same, maybe give a breathalyzer,lol .Drinking and driving is against the law, so would drinking and walking into my place of business with a firearm not be allowed.
I think a person who open carries would be more closely watched,lol.
I'll have another beer bartender,and give me a shot of that crowne royal whiskey , it helps the arthritis in my shooting hand,lol.
I like to feel loose before I go shopping with the wife. She drives me crazy, she has to touch and look at everything walking down the aisle,lol.
I personally choose to conceal carry in public to avoid anyone knowing I am in posession of a handgun, I feel more comfortable.
If the store or Bank I am in gets robbed I am running the other way,lol.
If your open carrying, you might just have become part of the bad guys plans ,robbers, their possible awareness that you are present and holding a firearm.
I choose to open carry if I am out hunting or walking my own property maybe plinking, target shooting.
There are times to conceal carry, and there are times to open carry ,just in my personal opinion.
It sounds less like a situation where an employee is enforcing company policy and more like the 7/11 just had an idiot employee making up their own rules. Did you ever contact the store manager or even better the owner? Maybe the clerk just needed their boss to straighten them out. Or maybe the company really deserved to lose your business. I don't know, but it sounds like neither do you.
Originally Posted by Benny1636
The issue of property rights trumping 2A rights and vis versa is a complicated matter.
A business open to the public is still private property. The legal definition states "Public property is that which is owned by the Government or the community as a whole, everything else is private" so basically their house their rules. Even though the doors are open to the public you are what is known as an "Invitee" and as such you must abide by their rules while on their property.
As far as the business assuming liability by posting no guns a "Duty to Care" must be shown. There are some different standards to measure this but one of the main one's is "Was the incident forseeable?" Obviously a random act of violence be it robbery or an active shooter is not so whether the business is posted or not it would not make any difference. A business is charged in regards to your safety as far as warnings about a wet floor, the coffee is served hot and so on but as long as they meet the general guidelines then they are not liable. As an example a store located in tornado alley has no obligation to provide a shelter in case it happens anymore than they are required to provide you with a free flashlight in case the power goes out.
It is a bit different in regards to employers and employee's. You have something called the "Law of Vicarious Liability". They are responsible for what there employee does while they are on the clock just as you are responsible for what your children do or what the person does who borrowed your car to run to the store. If that person slams into a car full of people that law would treat it just as if you were driving the car.
In regards to not supporting businesses that are anti gun we do it everyday whether we realize it or not. In the other topic I posted a link to anti gun businesses and organizations including hospitals, physician and nurses organizations, administrator and teacher organizations, groups that support retired persons, unions, religious leaders and religions, actors, musicians and so on. If we boycotted all the things that were anti gun we would be sitting in our homes eating peanut butter and crackers reading a 40 year old book. You would be home schooling your children, not be employed if you worked for a union and would be giving home medical care to your family.
Most people will support something up until it makes them go out of their way. If WalMart banned carry in their stores today yes their would be an uproar initially and I assure you that within a week many of the same people who were the loudest would be right back in the store for the sale on toilet paper.
In regards to the OC/CC thing either or whatever is legal and your choice. The only difference being if you OC there is a good chance you will be noticed and will have to deal with whatever comes up.
It is a slippery slope simply due to the fact that property rights that allow a business owner say what comes onto his property are the same ones that protect your property rights in your own home so we kind of have to be careful what we wish for.
Playing devil's advocate here, I own land. I fly airplanes. Why must I apply for a "land use permit" to build a runway on MY property if I indeed have freedom by owning land?
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
A very good point. ND toyed with the idea of eliminating property taxes, for a similar view. How can you truly "own" something if you are required to pay an annual fee to the government for it? If you don't pay, they can seize. Income is often viewed the same way, it is an extenson of yourself, and thus, yours. But you must pay taxes on it or face penalites. But alas, how could our wonderful and all-knowing government function without collecting some change from you? I'm all for a property owner being able to tell youo their wishes. The freedom that allows them to do so, is the same freedom that allows me to do as I wish on my property.
You can really own your property and pay no taxes on it. All you need to do is get allodial title on it. Same with your car. Get the statement of origin and you don't have to have it registered or pay taxes.
Originally Posted by CMaki
If I am wrong on this, please correct me, but I got if from a class on the Constitution.
I applaud GM's policy of allowing CCW in their store.
I also applaud their policy of not allowing people to handle loaded weapons inside their store for any reason what-so-ever.
Some people, even with CCW's are flipping IDIOTS!
Search tags for this page
can any business deny my right to carry
can business owners in va deny people with weapon permit right to carry firearm
concealed weapons at walmart platteville wi
german liberty 22
platteville, wi ccw do not patronize list
reasons for ccw in ny
right to carry vs property rights
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» Springfield Armory
» HGF Sponsors