Carrying in National Parks

    Results 1 to 3 of 3
    1. #1
      Junior Member
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Northern Kentucky
      Posts
      89

      Carrying in National Parks

      11th hour change. Looks like the old regime is trying to stick it to the new one. At least it works out to our advantage.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...120501991.html

    2. #2
      HGF Forum Moderator
      DJ Niner's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      North-Central USA
      Posts
      4,972
      Although that's the way the article seems to be spinning it, I don't necessarily agree. In the last 25 years, many states have legalized shall-issue concealed weapon permits; it's up around 40 states now, I think. We've seen an assault weapon/hi-cap magazine ban come and go, with no affect on crime rates. Even most Democrats stay away from the issue of Gun Control in public (or political campaigns), unless they live in or serve a highly anti-gun district or part of the country.

      I think many people are finally reaching the conclusion (long overdue) that guns in the hands of honest citizens are really no threat, and to restrict the rights of all citizens based on the actions of a few criminals or mentally ill individuals simply is not reasonable.

      As far as the "11th hour" reference, this rule change has been in the works for many months, if not years; it just happened to finalize recently. I sent in a comment on this proposed rule change during the public comment period about three months ago, and that period comes near the end (not the beginning) of the rule-change process. More BS from the press, if you ask me...

    3. #3
      Member
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Durango, Colorado
      Posts
      162
      Quote Originally Posted by DJ Niner View Post
      Although that's the way the article seems to be spinning it, I don't necessarily agree. In the last 25 years, many states have legalized shall-issue concealed weapon permits; it's up around 40 states now, I think. We've seen an assault weapon/hi-cap magazine ban come and go, with no affect on crime rates. Even most Democrats stay away from the issue of Gun Control in public (or political campaigns), unless they live in or serve a highly anti-gun district or part of the country.

      I think many people are finally reaching the conclusion (long overdue) that guns in the hands of honest citizens are really no threat, and to restrict the rights of all citizens based on the actions of a few criminals or mentally ill individuals simply is not reasonable.

      As far as the "11th hour" reference, this rule change has been in the works for many months, if not years; it just happened to finalize recently. I sent in a comment on this proposed rule change during the public comment period about three months ago, and that period comes near the end (not the beginning) of the rule-change process. More BS from the press, if you ask me...


      +1 - I agree completely

      I'm glad they got it worked out during the current administration though. It probably would have hit a brick wall with the Obama administration. I commented also during the public comment period and I am happy that they passed this.

    Sponsored Links

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •