That looks like a fun set-up!
How does it affect the accuracy? I assume the point-of-impact/zero might change when the can is attached, but are the groups any larger? If so, how much?
If you don't mind saying, that is; I'm just curious.
That looks like a fun set-up!
How does it affect the accuracy? I assume the point-of-impact/zero might change when the can is attached, but are the groups any larger? If so, how much?
If you don't mind saying, that is; I'm just curious.
If the POI changes, it's probably due to the use of slower velocity sub-sonic ammo. I don't normally shoot .22 pistols at distances where it makes a difference, at least not that I've noticed. I haven't had a chance to compare my rifles with the cans on/off yet; those distances might tell a different tale.
I've read that attaching a suppressor more often leads to tighter groups than shooting without it. I haven't noticed that, either.
I'm new to the forum and wondering if anyone can help me out. I've been reading a lot about the .17 HM2 (A.K.A. .17 Mach 2) and I was wondering if Browning (or any other manufacturers) are making a conversion barrel for the Buckmark yet.
They're getting 2100 fps and only .06" of drop at 100 yds with this round. Be a heck of a tack driver.
I've never seen any for sale or heard of anyone who makes a conversion barrel.
Very nice!
I figured I was getting my hopes up. I read an old article in shooting times on the .17 HM2 round and they used a Buckmark for one of the test guns. I figured someone might be making a conversion kit by now.