I'd say 9mm... Low recoil, may be easier for her to shoot and become comfortable with.
I am about to purchase a 90-TWO and I am trying to decide whether I should get the 40 or the 9mm. I trying to teach my wife to shoot, and I will keep the 90-two at home for self defense. I feel like the 9mm will be easier to teach her, and because I am in the fine state of maryland, I will most likely not be shooting at anyone in body armor,
Any advice, or insight?
I'd say 9mm... Low recoil, may be easier for her to shoot and become comfortable with.
"bing bang boom! hair out...hamburger time" - William Murderface
9mm:
Lighter recoil
Ammo less expensive
Holds more BBs
.40:
More powerful than 9mm
Kicks harder
More expensive to shoot
Holds fewer BBs
People will soon post and say 9mm is a weak-kneed peashooter and .40 is the Thunder Hammer of Thor. But in the real world - as opposed to the hypothetical internet - 9mm is fine for defense with good modern JHPs. It is also much easier for a new shooter to handle.
Last edited by Mike Barham; 07-05-2007 at 11:44 PM.
Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII
Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.
All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.
Yes, I say go for the 9mm too.
9mm.