Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3

    Difference between 92A1 and 92FS

    123
    I have been looking at both of these hand guns - pictures only - what is the difference between the two besides the price

  2. #2
    CW
    CW is offline
    Member CW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Keystone Commonwealth
    Posts
    415
    Besides the light rail on the frame? 92A1, 96A1 Have the rails.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Orange Co, NC
    Posts
    13

    Difference between 92A1 and 92FS

    92A1 has dovetail front sight, FS does not.
    92A1 has rounded trigger guard, FS is square

    Good chart in this Beretta doc...
    http://www.berettausa.com/assets/39/29/92FS_BORE.pdf

  4. #4
    HGF Forum Moderator
    Shipwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Beretta City, Texas
    Posts
    11,252
    The 92A1 has a recoil buffer in the frame - but it's really to increase frame longevity. In actual firing of 9mm ammo, you won't feel any difference.

    It really boils down to whether or not you want a rail.

    I have prev owned two M9A1s and two 92A1s in the past. I prefer the standard 92FS - it balances better, IMO, without the rail. At the moment, I have two 92FS models and a 92FS Brigadier. I like the guns iwth no rail... Although, I will admit that I have an oder in for that new Wilson Beretta Tactical 92. I've been looking at pics for months now, and everytime someone posts up one that they bought, it has been tempting me. I can no longer resist

Remove Ads

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •