Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    bspurs5's Avatar
    bspurs5 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Harrisonburg, VA
    Posts
    4

    Educate me on the PX4

    I own a Glock 19 (9mm) and have zero experience and not much study involved in Beretta; but now am curious. My brother in law asked me about the px4 and if I thought it was a good first time gun...

    Well, I don't know the answer for him. I don't know much about Beretta's or about the PX4 storm in particular. After looking it up, this is a sweet looking gun! A little lighter than my Glock, but longer and wider.

    I understand from other posts that a Compact version might be coming out soon?

    Any info regarding the reliability of Beretta's, their ease of upkeep, comparison to Glock, etc. would be greatly appreciated!

  2. #2
    Maximo's Avatar
    Maximo is offline Supporting Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth
    Posts
    891
    I have had more Berettas than anything else and and every one I have ever had has been absolutely top notch. They are easier to break down than most other guns, they are tough, accurate and above all very reliable. Now that is not to say you can't get one that has a problem, as with any manufacturer, but I have never had a problem with a Beretta including the PX4. Berettas come is different operating systems but the vast majority of the civilian market has the F version of each model which is a DA/SA with manual safety/de-cocker. The PX4 9mm has a 17+1 capacity, superluminova glow sights, and interchangeable backstraps to conform the gun to the shooters hand, and an accessory rail. Mine plays second fiddle to my Sig p229 for carry but it is my nightstand gun.


  3. #3
    Wandering Man's Avatar
    Wandering Man is offline GM HGF Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Coastal Bend, TX
    Posts
    2,121
    You can also research at www.Berettaforum.net.

    A bit biased, perhaps, but then I think we all have our biases.

    I love my PX4 in 9mm. Never had a problem with jamming, and once I had the sites adjusted, it's been very accurate.

    WM
    Last edited by Wandering Man; 02-29-2008 at 08:17 AM.
    Never argue with drunks or crazy people.

  4. #4
    Wyatt's Avatar
    Wyatt is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Naked City
    Posts
    713
    I own a 92FS. Berettas are VERY reliable. The 92 (M9) was extensively tested before it became standard issue for the U.S. Armed Forces. According to one source describing a summary of the tests:

    "Government-witnessed tests of the M9 pistol at the Beretta U.S.A. facility resulted in average reliability of the pistol at one malfunction every 17,500 rounds."

    Very reliable firearm. I have fed mine with all kinds of rounds from cheapo lead ball range ammo to the premium +P hollow points and have never had malfunction after more than 3,000 rounds.

  5. #5
    Mike Barham's Avatar
    Mike Barham is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Arizona, baby!
    Posts
    5,081
    While the 92FS is a supremely reliable pistol, I am not sure we can extrapolate that reliability to the PX4. The 92FS uses a fairly conventional tilting barrel, while the PX4 uses a rotary design. The PX4 may be very reliable indeed, but not because it shares many design elements with the 92FS.
    Last edited by Mike Barham; 02-29-2008 at 09:19 PM. Reason: grammar
    Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

    Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

    All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

  6. #6
    Wyatt's Avatar
    Wyatt is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Naked City
    Posts
    713
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
    While the 92FS is a supremely reliable pistol, I am not sure we can extrapolate that reliability to the PX4. The 92FS uses a fairly conventional tilting barrel, with the PX4 uses a rotary design. The PX4 may be very reliable indeed, but not because it shares many design elements with the 92FS.
    Agree. And I do not have first hand knowledge of the PX4. I hope my post wasn't construed as such.

  7. #7
    bspurs5's Avatar
    bspurs5 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Harrisonburg, VA
    Posts
    4
    Is there any confirmed information about a possible compact model of the px4 coming out, or is that just rumor?

    Also, does anyone have experience with both the px4 and Glocks, that can speak on behalf of the reliability and durability of each?

  8. #8
    DjSaneR's Avatar
    DjSaneR is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    South Windsor, CT.
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by bspurs5 View Post
    Is there any confirmed information about a possible compact model of the px4 coming out, or is that just rumor?
    Yes, however, the release date keeps getting pushed back. I called Beretta the other day and they're saying it should be out March/April. Here is some information from the Beretta website. Here is a test conducted by Guns and Ammo Magazine. Good review.

  9. #9
    maxkimber is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2
    I recently bought a Px4 Type C in .40 S&W. It is a top-notch pistol and when the sub-compact comes out it will be mine as well... I recommend the BerettaForums as well. That is where I researched my purchase...

  10. #10
    Mike Barham's Avatar
    Mike Barham is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Arizona, baby!
    Posts
    5,081
    Quote Originally Posted by DjSaneR View Post
    Here is a test conducted by Guns and Ammo Magazine. Good review.
    Has anyone ever seen a bad review in G&A?
    Employed by Galco Gunleather - www.galcogunleather.com / Veteran OEF VIII

    Donate to the Christian and Stephanie Nielson Recovery fund: http://www.nierecovery.com/.

    All opinions, particularly those involving politics and Glocks, are mine and not Galco's.

  11. #11
    Shipwreck's Avatar
    Shipwreck is offline HGF Forum Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Beretta City, Texas
    Posts
    10,822
    I have a 40 cal PX4. IT is my first 40 - as I have never been a 40 cal fan.

    Howevr, this gun cuts down on 40 cal recoil better than any 40 cal I have shot. Its even less than the large Beretta 96.

    In 9mm, the rotating barrel doesn't seem to do as much for the recoil - as it seems pretty standard to any 9mm I have shot - in the recoil dept. But for a 40 cal - it is a great gun!

  12. #12
    PX4 Storm's Avatar
    PX4 Storm is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14
    The negatives in the reviews are very subtle.

    The most interesting thing in the G&A review of the PX4 Subcompact was the guns accuracy. The reviewer was averaging 2 inch groups at 25 yards. One group was 1.25 inches- not bad for a subcompact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
    Has anyone ever seen a bad review in G&A?

  13. #13
    Maximo's Avatar
    Maximo is offline Supporting Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dallas/Ft. Worth
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by PX4 Storm View Post
    The negatives in the reviews are very subtle.

    That just about says it. You have to read a gun mag the same way you listen to the news. You have to read between the lines and ask yourself what are they not telling me? A great example is an article last year I think in American Handgunner about the Wilson ADP. The reviewer tippy toed around calling it the biggest piece of S$%* he had ever shot. Kind of disappointed me because before that article I really wanted one. I have yet to find a Sub-compact I shoot well and or enjoy shooting but I am looking forward to giving the px4 SC a try.

  14. #14
    HadEmAll is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Barham View Post
    The 92FS uses a fairly conventional tilting barrel, while the PX4 uses a rotary design..............
    Your point about the dissimilarities between the 92 and PX4 is well taken, but I want to point out that the 92 barrel does not tilt. Pretty much straight-line recoil. Beretta seems to design around that tilt barrel, except in the PX4 compact version.

  15. #15
    DjSaneR's Avatar
    DjSaneR is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    South Windsor, CT.
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by DjSaneR View Post
    Yes, however, the release date keeps getting pushed back. I called Beretta the other day and they're saying it should be out March/April.

    ...So March is gone, we're half way through April, and the subcompact is STILL not available.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

beretta forum
,

beretta px4 reliability

,
beretta px4 reliability review
,
beretta px4 storm hollow points
,

beretta px4 storm reliability

,
beretta storm px4 reliability
,
best ammo for beretta px4 storm .40
,
best ammo for px4 storm 9mm
,

px4 reliability

,
px4 reliability test
,
px4 review 9mm reliability
,

px4 storm reliability

Click on a term to search for related topics.